Want this question answered?
I would say, heat engine on earth would waste the most energy since it is always limited by thermodynamic efficiency to have some loss. In general, lower the temperature difference will resulted to lower the efficiency, a simple steam engine for a train would be of lower efficiency than a internal combustion engine and lower than complex high pressure steam turbine and is probably the lowest engine efficiency in commercial scale.
I guess that would be the Law of Conservation of Energy.
I might be wrong on this one, but I believe it is either a cell or a photocell. A cell would be correct, a photocell converts light energy into electrical energy.
When a gas changes to a liquid, it goes through the process of Condensation. This is when the gas cools and loses energy. Then the particles are forced to change state, from a gas to a liquid.
The potential energy of a bus typically changes into kinetic energy for the bus to move. When the bus starts moving, the stored potential energy is converted into the energy of motion, resulting in the bus's kinetic energy.
Something is alive if it can reproduce, respond to changes in its environment, can convert some form of energy into energy to sustain its self, and produces waste.
Energy is wasted through activity so I guess not doing anything would not waste energy but it is hard to not waste any energy at all
When you waste energy,during night time, no one would se anything
I would say, heat engine on earth would waste the most energy since it is always limited by thermodynamic efficiency to have some loss. In general, lower the temperature difference will resulted to lower the efficiency, a simple steam engine for a train would be of lower efficiency than a internal combustion engine and lower than complex high pressure steam turbine and is probably the lowest engine efficiency in commercial scale.
it would not be able to functionlike store food and waste or energy
A steam engine would be one example, a motor car engine would be another.
No, lasers would not cause nuclear changes, they would only melt or vaporise material which is not what is wanted. The nuclear properties of the waste would remain the same.
I guess that would be the Law of Conservation of Energy.
I guess that would be the Law of Conservation of Energy.
the suns energy gets absorbed by plants leaves witch then produces sugars then livestock would eat that then we would ''harvest" the cattle and eat them then we would produce waste then that waste would be made into fertilizers to grow crops to feed livestock then repeat
No, when it is not in use, the microwave would not have a light on. Why would you want the light on when you are not using it and waste energy?
Incineration reduces the total volume of waste and produces much needed energy. this is the answer for study island