the correct answer is what language a child first learns
Personality traits, beliefs, values, attitudes, and social behaviors are generally influenced more by nurture (environmental factors such as upbringing, experiences, and cultural influences) than by nature (genetic factors). These aspects of an individual can be shaped and developed through various external influences throughout life.
You will have to include the characteristics. a] a person's biological sex b. what language a child first learns c. eye color d. instinctive behavior
nurture -apex :)
It's a bit more complicated than that - but yes.
Personality traits, beliefs, values, and attitudes are generally more influenced by nurture than nature. These aspects of a person are shaped by their environment, upbringing, experiences, and interactions with others rather than being solely predetermined by genetics.
This phrase suggests that genetic factors and innate characteristics have a stronger influence on an individual's development and behavior than environmental influences or upbringing. It highlights the idea that nature, or genetics, ultimately plays a more significant role in shaping who we are compared to nurture, or environmental factors.
It is not accurate to make a blanket statement that humans have more control over their destinies based on being a product of nature rather than nurture. Both nature and nurture influence human development and behavior, and individuals have varying degrees of control over their destinies regardless of these factors. Additionally, the interaction between nature and nurture is complex and can differ from person to person.
The "nature vs. nurture" debate suggests that either genetics ("nature") or the environment ("nurture'') played a major role in producing particular behaviors, personality traits, psychological disorders, or pretty much any other thing that a human does. The emerging picture from current research is that both nurture and nature play a role in directing behavior, and the focus has shifted to examining the relative contributions of each influence rather than the absolute contributions of either influence alone. In short, it's the interaction of genes and environmental influences that determines what humans do.
they can do more activities
The nature vs. nurture debate concerns the relative influence of genetics and environment on human development and behavior. Contemporary research suggests that both factors interact to shape individuals, rather than one being solely responsible. It is now widely accepted that both nature and nurture play significant roles in determining characteristics such as intelligence, personality, and mental health.
This brings up the old "nature versus nurture" debate. Some might argue that testosterone (nature) is responsible. Others might argue (nurture) that boys are brought up to be more aggressive than girls, that boys are brought up playing contact sports, etc, while girls play house and have tea parties. The answer probably lies somewhere in between, that both nature and nurture are responsible.
* Control your obsessions or they will destroy you * Nurture is more important than nature * Financial support for Mary Shelley and her children.