Want this question answered?
Make choices affecting their lives
An advocate works to help support certain people, or causes. Advocates will often argue their position in person or through letters.
No religion advocates fighting and no person who considers them self 'spiritual' would fight.
Advocate definition: To speak, plead, or argue in favor of A good teacher is an advocate of education. they should create an interest for the pupil in the subject of interest.
They argued that most immigrants would work for low wages, which would take the jobs from them.
The Second Amendment is the amendment that causes the most friction between gun control advocates and the National Rifle Association (NRA). Gun control advocates argue for stricter regulations to address gun violence, while the NRA strongly defends the interpretation that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual's right to own and carry firearms. The clash arises due to the differing perspectives on how to balance gun rights and public safety.
Captain Jaggery and Hollybrass argue over leadership and decision-making on board the ship. Captain Jaggery believes in strict discipline and order, while Hollybrass advocates for a more compassionate and humane approach. Their conflicting views on leadership and handling difficult situations lead to tension and disagreements between them.
Argue about what. Be more specific.
to argue = hitvake'akh (??????)
Social responsibility advocates respond to this assertion by stating that legal rules set the minimum responsibility of a corporation. The corporation as to go above and beyond this minimum.
Don't argue; dicker. I won't argue the point.
It's important to note that Arizona didn't recognize civil unions for homosexuals in the first place, so the purpose of Prop 8 wasn't to ban a freedom (which was already denied) so much as bar AZ courts from being able to overturn the ruling. The job of the court is to determine whether or not something is constitutional. Making a constitutional amendment stating that marriage is defined as an act between a man and a woman bars the court from potentially allowing civil unions for gays. So yes, Prop 8 reiterates the ban on civil unions between homosexuals, but no, it doesn't ban civil unions between heterosexuals (though one can certainly argue it illegitimizes them and makes them more vulnerable). It's important to note that Arizona didn't recognize civil unions for homosexuals in the first place, so the purpose of Prop 8 wasn't to ban a freedom (which was already denied) so much as bar AZ courts from being able to overturn the ruling. The job of the court is to determine whether or not something is constitutional. Making a constitutional amendment stating that marriage is defined as an act between a man and a woman bars the court from potentially allowing civil unions for gays. So yes, Prop 8 reiterates the ban on civil unions between homosexuals, but no, it doesn't ban civil unions between heterosexuals (though one can certainly argue it illegitimizes them and makes them more vulnerable).