False.
Signapore colonizers used indirect rule. :)
They weren’t “mean”. The king owned the colonies and everyone was a subject of the king. They all were English and under English rule.
Britain practiced indirect rule in its colonies because it was a more cost-effective and efficient method of administration. Indirect rule involved using local leaders and traditional institutions to govern the colony, rather than replacing them with British officials. This allowed Britain to maintain control over the colony while minimizing the need for a large colonial bureaucracy.
Indirect Rule means to rely on existing political elites and institutionsThe use of one country's existing political structures by the colonizing country for governance
b and c also a
Boer republics were under direct rule
the nation that had all the short black people
indirect rule
indirect
False.
No. It was under rule of Hindu Kings No. It was under rule of Hindu Kings
There are different methods for ruling a country. Specifically, a country can be ruled through direct rule, which involves the leader living in the country they rule. Or a country can be ruled through indirect rule, which involves a ruler governing from another country.
Egypt was under direct rule in ancient times. This meant that it was not a colony that had a mother country dictating its laws and appointing political figures.
A: The system of indirect rule alienated the educated elites in preference to the illiterate ones. Q: What are some disadvantages of indirect rule?
Signapore colonizers used indirect rule. :)
indirect rule