red hair. and probably hazel eyes.
yip
Most likely it will be blonde because red is more recessive than Blonde. Followed by strawberry blonde, a hybrid of the two. Least likely it will be completely red. In rare cases red can be dominant to blonde.
I'm Egyptian and I'm white with green eyes and blonde hair. Your question is odd.
If the mother's genotype is AA, the child can be A+ or A- If the mother's genotype is AO, the child can be A+, A-, O+, or O- Most likely A+
AB+
To the state? Yes To the father? Not so likely
not totally sure, but based off of genetics...both of his parents would have to have a recessive gene for blonde hair, and he was that 25% chance that they would have a blonde haired child.
if a man has blonde hair and both of his parents have black hair,he marries a woman with blonde hair,her father has blonde hair and her mother has black,they have a child that has blonde hair
It depends on the state. In most states the father would still be required to pay child support, even though he is living with the mother and the child. However, if the father was financially supporting the mother and child, it's likely that the courts would suspend the child support order.
Probably more than likely A+. Because the +Rh gene is usually dominate. Take for instance- Mother is A+, Child is A=. Father is A=, In this instance the father has the dominate gene for the absence of the Rh antigen on the redcell. The mother is recessive.
Since you asked for an opinion I will offer one. No, the child should not have the father's name since it is statistically likely she will have most of the responsibility for raising her child. If the father wanted the child to have his name then he should marry the mother and take full financial responsibility for the child. The mother will always be with her child. That may not be so with the father.Since you asked for an opinion I will offer one. No, the child should not have the father's name since it is statistically likely she will have most of the responsibility for raising her child. If the father wanted the child to have his name then he should marry the mother and take full financial responsibility for the child. The mother will always be with her child. That may not be so with the father.Since you asked for an opinion I will offer one. No, the child should not have the father's name since it is statistically likely she will have most of the responsibility for raising her child. If the father wanted the child to have his name then he should marry the mother and take full financial responsibility for the child. The mother will always be with her child. That may not be so with the father.Since you asked for an opinion I will offer one. No, the child should not have the father's name since it is statistically likely she will have most of the responsibility for raising her child. If the father wanted the child to have his name then he should marry the mother and take full financial responsibility for the child. The mother will always be with her child. That may not be so with the father.
Each situation is different and there is no set answer. The judge will decide. If the biological father is a fit parent then he will most likely be awarded custody. The grandmother would most likely have visitation rights. The judge will look at the situation and decide what is best for the welfare of the child.