0
Wal-Mart, Target, and Costco, companies that compete with each other.
What else can I help you with?
What companies take a accommodating stance to social responsibility?
Wal-Mart, Target, and Costco, companies that compete with each other.
What are three companies that take a defensive stance to social responsibility?
Three companies that take a defensive stance to social responsibility include Hobby Lobby, Chick-fil-A and Freshway. These companies have gotten bad feedback but they stand behind their beliefs.
What company take accommodative stance?
name three companies that are denfensive stance,accommodating stance and proactive stance
What are three companies takes a defensive stance in social responsibility?
hospitals are one type of business that take a defensive stance.
How companies that take a defensive stance to social responsibility?
Companies take a defensive stance to social responsibility by doing only what is required of them by law and nothing more. Tobacco companies are a good example, as domestically they follow the laws; placing warnings on packs, not advertising. But in countries where that is not the law, the go above and beyond to sell their products.
What companies take a proative stance to social responsibility?
Several companies are known for taking a proactive stance on social responsibility, including Patagonia, Ben & Jerry's, and TOMS. Patagonia emphasizes environmental sustainability and ethical sourcing in its operations, while Ben & Jerry's advocates for social justice and climate action through various initiatives. TOMS operates on a one-for-one model, donating a pair of shoes for every pair sold, and has expanded its focus to support mental health and education. These companies integrate social responsibility into their core business strategies, demonstrating a commitment to making a positive impact.
What are three economic that a government may have?
Three companies that have take a defensive stance to social responsibility are R.J.Reynolds,Walmart,and BP.Social responsibility is an ethical or ideological theory meaning that business should act beneficently.Cha Cha!
What are three economic stances that a government may have?
Three companies that have take a defensive stance to social responsibility are R.J.Reynolds,Walmart,and BP.Social responsibility is an ethical or ideological theory meaning that business should act beneficently.Cha Cha!
What are some reasons to why companies take a defensive stance to social responsibility?
Companies may adopt a defensive stance to social responsibility to mitigate potential risks, such as negative publicity or legal repercussions. By addressing social and environmental issues, they aim to protect their brand reputation and maintain customer loyalty. Additionally, a defensive approach can help them comply with regulations and avoid financial penalties, ensuring long-term sustainability. Ultimately, this stance reflects a reactive strategy to safeguard the company’s interests rather than a proactive commitment to societal well-being.
What is defensive stance in social responsibility?
A defensive stance in social responsibility refers to an organization's approach where it prioritizes compliance with legal and regulatory standards while avoiding any actions that could be perceived as socially irresponsible. Companies adopting this stance typically focus on minimizing risk and protecting their reputation rather than proactively engaging in socially beneficial initiatives. This approach often leads to reactive measures rather than a commitment to sustainable practices or community engagement. Ultimately, a defensive stance may limit the potential for positive social impact and innovation.
What is an obstructionist stance in social responsibility?
An obstructionist stance in social responsibility refers to a corporate or organizational approach that actively resists or avoids taking responsibility for social and environmental issues. Organizations adopting this stance may prioritize profit over ethical considerations, often neglecting their impact on stakeholders and the community. They may engage in practices that undermine regulations, transparency, or accountability, preferring to remain uninvolved in social initiatives. This approach contrasts sharply with more proactive strategies that embrace corporate social responsibility and ethical engagement.
What is the difference among social responsiveness social obligation and social responsibility?
social obligation - needs to obey the rules social responsiveness - make the rules social responsibility - taking more pro active stance on action
