0
What else can I help you with?
Can a case proceed to trial without any evidence?
No, a case cannot proceed to trial without any evidence. Evidence is necessary to support the claims made by both the prosecution and defense in a trial. Without evidence, there is no basis for a trial to proceed.
How do you find what evidence the DA has?
Defense counsel must be provided with evidence. If you are a spectator you must attend the trial and see for yourself what evidence is produced at trial.Defense counsel must be provided with evidence. If you are a spectator you must attend the trial and see for yourself what evidence is produced at trial.Defense counsel must be provided with evidence. If you are a spectator you must attend the trial and see for yourself what evidence is produced at trial.Defense counsel must be provided with evidence. If you are a spectator you must attend the trial and see for yourself what evidence is produced at trial.
What is a trial exhibit?
It is a piece of physical evidence presented at trial.
What is mean by expulcatory?
Exculpatory evidence at trial is evidence which helps to prove the innocence of the person on trial. The opposite word is inculpatory, evidence which proves his guilt.
Who makes the decision at trial that the evidence offered is relevant?
Relevant evidence is ANY evidence which will tend to prove either the guilt (or innocence) of the defendant on trial. Therefore, anything that is not NOT relevant is NOT EVIDENCE and will not be admitted.
Which nutrient comprises the largest percetage of the body's composition?
The nutrient comprises the largest percentage of the body's composition is water. The body is made up of over 60 percent of water.
What is a map hearing?
A "Mapp" hearing is a pre-trial hearing on whether or not to suppress a piece of evidence that is going to be introduced at trial. The evidence could be tangible evidence, such as an illegal substance, or intangible evidence, such as a confession.
Is it permissible for new evidence to be introduced during a trial?
Yes, it is generally permissible for new evidence to be introduced during a trial, as long as it is relevant to the case and meets the rules of evidence.
Can you use the same evidence in a mistrial as in the original trial?
No, in a mistrial, the evidence from the original trial cannot be used again. The case must be retried with new evidence and a new jury.
Can evidence from one trial be used in another?
If the evidence is relevant in another trial, it can be used. The issue may be whether there should be a second trial at all. If it is a second trial with the same defendant there are issues of double jeopardy. If it is a second trial with a different defendant then the question arises whether the evidence is relevant. There can also be a civil trial following a criminal trial, in which case again the question is one of relevance. The most famous civil trial following a criminal trial is the OJ Simpson situation, and much evidence from the criminal trial was relevant to the civil lawsuit. See related links below.
Why was Tucker brought to trial?
Tucker was brought to trial because he was accused of committing a crime and there was enough evidence to warrant a trial to determine his guilt or innocence. The trial is a legal process where evidence is presented and a verdict is reached by a judge or jury.
What is to suppress in a trial?
Suppress means to exclude or prevent disclosure, often used in reference to evidence sought to be introduced at a criminal trial. A motion to suppress is a request to a judge to keep out evidence at a trial or hearing, often made when a party believes the evidence was unlawfully obtained.
