answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What conclusion might reasonably be drawn about the character?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Philosophy

What makes something a syllogism?

A syllogism consists of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion. It is a formal scheme of a logical argument. Syllogisms can result in true conclusions correctly drawn, or they might lead to absurd or subtlely wrong conclusions for several different reasons that are part of the study of logic. For example:Light is the visible range of the electromagnetic spectrum.Jane's lunch was light.Therefore, Jane's lunch was the visible range of the electromagnetic spectrum.Or,Each element has a unique atomic number.Carbon is an element.Therefore, carbon has a unique atomic number.


Why might a writer include a question in a conclusion?

Including a question in a conclusion can provoke thought and encourage the reader to consider alternative perspectives or reflect on the topic. It can also leave a lasting impact by prompting further discussion or inviting the reader to contemplate the implications of the argument presented in the writing.


What does a conclusion need?

A conclusion needs to summarize the main points of the discussion, restate the thesis or main argument, and provide closure to the reader by offering a final thought or reflection on the topic. It should leave a lasting impression on the reader and reinforce the importance of the ideas presented in the paper or discussion.


What is taking an opponent's argument to its illogical conclusion?

Taking an opponent's argument to its illogical conclusion, also known as reductio ad absurdum, involves extending their argument to an extreme or absurd scenario to highlight its flaws or logical inconsistencies. This technique aims to demonstrate that following the opponent's argument leads to unreasonable or nonsensical outcomes.


The Greek philosophy of exploring all possibilities and examples before reaching a conclusion is called what?

The Greek philosophy of exploring all possibilities and examples before reaching a conclusion is called dialectic. This method involves engaging in dialogue and critical thinking to arrive at truth and understanding.

Related questions

What might an superstitious character do?

what might an superstitious character do


What might you ask yourself when drawing a conclusion?

you need to ask ----> Does my conclusion support my hypothesis?


Can you come to a conclusion from a table?

Sure you can. You might conclude that the table is clean, or dirty, or made of plastic or wood, or both. You might determine that the table is broken, and know whether it can be fixed or whether it needs to be replaced. Lots of conclusions can be drawn from a table. A table of data might lead you to draw other conclusions, accurately or inaccurately.


A summary of what you have learned from a scientific experiment is called a?

it might be conclusion but Iam wrong


How can a 11 yr old girl make real money without doing yard work get real money doing big things?

Become a famous entertainer (actor/dancer/singer). You might reasonably conclude that I'm saying in other words "you don't," and you would be correct in this conclusion.


Studying the plot elements in A Pair of Silk Stockings you might reasonably conclude that the essence of her story A. emphasizes the hardship of poverty. B. is identical to Paul's?

Studying the plot elements in "A Pair of Silk Stockings," you might reasonably conclude that the essence of her story


What might you ask yourself and drawing a conclusion about an experiment?

You might ask yourself what did I learn from this test and how


What might a envious character do?


How might you describe a congressional district that has been drawn by A legislature a very odd shape?

You might describe it as a gerrymander.


What is the definition of details?

The definition of supporting details is to give more information about the topic and or details or information that backs up an sentence. For example, you might make a 'conclusion' or determination that a book character "was depressed". The supporting details might be that this character:held a picture of the deceased spousecried all the timewithdrew and refused visitorsmoped aroundstayed in their roomrefused to eat.We often make assumptions or determinations when we read, but we must be able to state why we made these conclusions about a character. An author shows rather than tells a conclusion--we must also show how we make our determinations based on what the author showed--or did not show.


Can aragog be a playable character?

I think he's a playable character because he might be a bonus character.


How might data be used?

assumed facts from which inferences are drawn and opinions formed