Want this question answered?
A syllogism consists of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion. It is a formal scheme of a logical argument. Syllogisms can result in true conclusions correctly drawn, or they might lead to absurd or subtlely wrong conclusions for several different reasons that are part of the study of logic. For example:Light is the visible range of the electromagnetic spectrum.Jane's lunch was light.Therefore, Jane's lunch was the visible range of the electromagnetic spectrum.Or,Each element has a unique atomic number.Carbon is an element.Therefore, carbon has a unique atomic number.
Including a question in a conclusion can provoke thought and encourage the reader to consider alternative perspectives or reflect on the topic. It can also leave a lasting impact by prompting further discussion or inviting the reader to contemplate the implications of the argument presented in the writing.
A conclusion needs to summarize the main points of the discussion, restate the thesis or main argument, and provide closure to the reader by offering a final thought or reflection on the topic. It should leave a lasting impression on the reader and reinforce the importance of the ideas presented in the paper or discussion.
Taking an opponent's argument to its illogical conclusion, also known as reductio ad absurdum, involves extending their argument to an extreme or absurd scenario to highlight its flaws or logical inconsistencies. This technique aims to demonstrate that following the opponent's argument leads to unreasonable or nonsensical outcomes.
The Greek philosophy of exploring all possibilities and examples before reaching a conclusion is called dialectic. This method involves engaging in dialogue and critical thinking to arrive at truth and understanding.
what might an superstitious character do
you need to ask ----> Does my conclusion support my hypothesis?
Sure you can. You might conclude that the table is clean, or dirty, or made of plastic or wood, or both. You might determine that the table is broken, and know whether it can be fixed or whether it needs to be replaced. Lots of conclusions can be drawn from a table. A table of data might lead you to draw other conclusions, accurately or inaccurately.
it might be conclusion but Iam wrong
Become a famous entertainer (actor/dancer/singer). You might reasonably conclude that I'm saying in other words "you don't," and you would be correct in this conclusion.
Studying the plot elements in "A Pair of Silk Stockings," you might reasonably conclude that the essence of her story
You might ask yourself what did I learn from this test and how
You might describe it as a gerrymander.
The definition of supporting details is to give more information about the topic and or details or information that backs up an sentence. For example, you might make a 'conclusion' or determination that a book character "was depressed". The supporting details might be that this character:held a picture of the deceased spousecried all the timewithdrew and refused visitorsmoped aroundstayed in their roomrefused to eat.We often make assumptions or determinations when we read, but we must be able to state why we made these conclusions about a character. An author shows rather than tells a conclusion--we must also show how we make our determinations based on what the author showed--or did not show.
I think he's a playable character because he might be a bonus character.
assumed facts from which inferences are drawn and opinions formed