M
One of the core concepts to democracy regards the civilian control of the military. In these systems the highest military official is the civilian head of government as commander-in-chief. This in contrast to juntas where the military is the government.
No, in a democratic system, the military is subordinate to civilian government authority and cannot override it under normal circumstances.
A civilian regime refers to a government that is predominantly made up of civilian leaders who are not part of the military. In a civilian regime, power is usually vested in elected officials and civilian institutions, rather than military authorities.
The most useful of the degree of democracy reached by a particular society is whether it has a civilian government. Other forms of government can happen in non-democratic platforms.
When an individual or entity has complete control over a nation's armed forces, it is often referred to as "military dictatorship" or "military rule." In such a system, the military exerts significant influence over the government and may operate without civilian oversight. This concentration of power can undermine democratic institutions and civil liberties.
The United States President (a civilian) is the Commander in Chief of the American armed forces. If a general in the army was to become the President of the USA, he or she would not be allowed to remain in the army.
There are not many advantages of a military government over a civilian government. One thing that may be considered an advantage is that a military government is always ready to defend its country.
Is it martially marked, or a civilian sold gun? What is the graded condition? Bert H. It is civilian sold in very good condition and is a take down model.
1932
yes
hell no
1932