Civilian supremacy over the military is manifested through several key mechanisms, including the establishment of a civilian-led government that makes defense policy decisions, legislative oversight of military budgets and operations, and the appointment of civilian officials to top defense positions. Additionally, civilian control is reinforced by constitutional provisions that delineate the roles and powers of military and civilian authorities. This dynamic ensures that military actions align with democratic values and the will of the populace, thereby preventing military overreach or influence in political affairs.
Nationalism contributed to World War 1 because some nations wanted to assert their country's power and dominance over others. European nations believed in their own cultural, economic, and military supremacy and each country believed that, in the case of war, their country would be victorious. Since the people believed that their nations and governments were right and that their military could win any conflict, little was done to reduce the chance of war. Instead, each country tried to prove their power and dominance. cultural, economic and military supremacy. cultural, economic and military supremacy.
When an individual or entity has complete control over a nation's armed forces, it is often referred to as "military dictatorship" or "military rule." In such a system, the military exerts significant influence over the government and may operate without civilian oversight. This concentration of power can undermine democratic institutions and civil liberties.
A military-run country is often referred to as a "military junta" or "military regime." In such a system, the military exercises significant control over the government and may replace civilian leadership through a coup d'état. These regimes typically restrict political freedoms and may impose martial law.
Approximately 70-85 million people died during World War II, including military and civilian deaths. The exact number of military deaths is estimated to be around 15-17 million.
After a conquest, it is customary for the military to administer the newly gained territories until a civilian government can be installed. The military will maintain law and order, until it deems it time for a peaceful civilian government to take it's place. Example: California was won from Mexico during the Mexican War of 1846-48. California had 7 US Military Governors before obtaining statehood in 1850. California never had a US Territorial Governor.
Refers to the supremacy of elected civilian public officials over the military. The elected President is the Commander in Chief and ONLY THE CONGRESS CAN DECLARE WAR.
Claude Emerson Welch has written: 'Civilian control of the military' -- subject(s): Civil supremacy over the military, Politics and government 'Soldier and state in Africa: a comparative analysis of military intervention and political change' -- subject(s): Political activity, Armed Forces 'Civilian control of the military' -- subject(s): Politics and government, Civil supremacy over the military 'Military rule and the imperatives of democracy' -- subject(s): Politics and government, Civil supremacy over the military 'Civilizan control of the military' -- subject(s): Civil supremacy over the military 'Anatomy of rebellion' -- subject(s): Case studies, Violence, Revolutions, Peasant uprisings 'Political modernization' -- subject(s): Political science, Social change, Addresses, essays, lectures
Robert Previdi has written: 'Civilian control versus military rule' -- subject(s): Civil supremacy over the military, Civil-military relations, Reorganization, United States, United States. Dept. of Defense
Because military in Philippines is the protector of the people and the state.
There are not many advantages of a military government over a civilian government. One thing that may be considered an advantage is that a military government is always ready to defend its country.
hell no
Marshall Law
Martial Law .
Yes. The commander in chief of the US military is a civilian, and will always be in ultimate control of the military. This is one of the major tenants of the construct the founders put in place to guard against the military seizing power.
No, a four-star army general does not have authority over civilian police. Civilian law enforcement agencies operate under local, state, or federal government authority and are independent from military command. In the United States, for example, the Posse Comitatus Act restricts the use of the military in domestic law enforcement, ensuring civilian control over police matters. However, in certain situations, such as national emergencies, the military may provide support to civilian authorities, but that does not equate to direct command.
Germany military - 3,250,000 civilian - 2,350,000 Italy military - 226,900 civilian - 60,000 Japan military - 1,740,000 civilian - 393,400 US military 405,000 civilian - 68 (Pearl Harbor) France military 122,000 civilian - 470,000 England military - 305,800 civilian - 6,700,000 Russia military - 11,000,000 civilian - 6,700,000 China military - 1,400,000 civilian - 8,000,000 Poland- from 5.5m to 6.5m all together (not caunting many soldiers who fleed the country and joined army in other countries)
The Canadian military is under civilian control to ensure that it remains accountable to elected officials and reflects the values and priorities of Canadian society. This principle, rooted in democratic governance, helps prevent the military from wielding undue influence over politics and maintains a clear separation between military and civilian roles. Civilian oversight fosters transparency, promotes responsible decision-making, and ensures that military actions align with national interests and human rights standards.