The question misspells the Supreme Court case. It is "Kelo v. New London", and it was over the question of eminent domain. The city took a large section of the neighborhoods around Ft. Trumbull by eminent domain. Suzette Kelo, in "the little pink house", fought it all the way to the Supreme Court. Sadly, she lost. The case determined that merely collecting more revenue served a "public use" under the constitution. "Public Use" brings to mind roads, bridges, schools, etc., in most people's minds, but today's jurisprudence sometimes places the dictionary up for auction to the highest bidder.
Bud, New London
FederalismFederalismFederalismFederalismfederalismthe answer is C federalism
The primary conflict of the Constitutional Convention was settling how states would be represented in Congress and whether this would be an equal number or vary based on population. The Connecticut Compromise resolved this issue.
a house of reps and senate was created so each state would have equal representation
there was no constitutional issue, it was a copyright infringement and vicarious liability issue.
One controversial issue in the Constitutional Conventions of the1890s was the location of the federal capital How was this issue resolved?
Represntation
Constitutional convention deadlocked over the issue of representation. The delegates did not seem to agree on the selection of representatives to the Congress.
The fundamental issue that was raised at the constitutional convention was slave trade and human rights abuses. Those were the issues that were strife then.
blahhh
At the Constitutional Convention, the most significant disagreement dealt with the issue of representation in the legislature. The convention was held in 1787.
because......
The Great Compromise was proposed by the Connecticut representative to the Constitutional Convention of 1787. The Great Compromise decided that representation in the House would be based on population, whereas each state would have an equal number of senators.