The US explored Antarctica.
The US Exploring Expedition, also known as the Wilkes Expedition, did not prove the existence of any new continent. Instead, it focused on exploring the waters and lands of the Pacific region, including Antarctica, and contributing to scientific knowledge about that region.
The Louis and Clark Expedition helped prove that there was not an all water route across the Continent
Evidence to prove the existence of the supercontinent Pangaea includes fossil evidence of similar plant and animal species across continents, the matching shapes of coastlines and mountain ranges on different continents, and the distribution of ancient rock formations that line up when continents are fitted together. Additionally, geological evidence such as rock layers and paleoclimatic data also supports the theory of Pangaea's existence.
The force of plate tectonics, driven by the movement of Earth's lithosphere, caused the continents to shift from one supercontinent to their present positions. This movement is a result of the interactions between different tectonic plates at convergent, divergent, and transform plate boundaries.
In order for an explorer to claim land, they typically need to discover and explore the land, establish residency or settlement on it, and follow the legal procedures for claiming ownership, which can vary depending on the jurisdiction and laws governing the land. This may involve obtaining documentation or titles from the relevant authorities to prove ownership.
Alfred Wegener used geological and paleontological evidence to propose the theory of continental drift. He observed similarities in rock formations, fossils, and mountain ranges on different continents that suggested they were once connected. Additionally, Wegener developed a hypothesis known as Pangaea, suggesting a supercontinent that gradually broke apart over millions of years to form the continents we see today.
The Louis and Clark Expedition helped prove that there was not an all water route across the Continent
The Louis and Clark Expedition helped prove that there was not an all water route across the Continent
The bottom line is "No."It likewise does not prove that God does notexist.
As easily as you can prove the United States exists -- people have been to both places. Or simply - if you can see it, and other people can see it, then it exists.
You go to Alberta and find Steve, and Steve will help you prove it exists... Hes super cool
light a match
lopohhhhuhihgguyfhyftydt
Coronado's expedition, while ultimately unsuccessful in finding promised riches, provided valuable information about the geography and native cultures of the Southwest region of North America. This knowledge helped establish Spanish claims in the area and paved the way for future expeditions and colonization efforts.
People have so many definitions of God so it is hard to prove that God exists. A religious experience may make a believer of you but it may not "prove" God exists as your experience may not convince a non-believer.
mr amazing
Descartes famously said "Cogito, ergo sum" or "I think, therefore I am." He argued that even if he was being deceived by an evil demon, the act of doubting his existence still indicated his own existence as a thinking thing. Therefore, the very act of thinking proved his existence.
On James Cook's second journey which lasted from 1772-1775, he commanded the 'Resolution' and the 'Adventure' on an expedition to the South Pacific, in order to either prove or disprove the rumour of a great southern continent.