Want this question answered?
the wealthy french planters
England had a society with an aristocratic class, and the southern planters wanted the same.
Better chance for farmers to become wealthy
They did not fight against income tax for the wealthy, or encourage farmers to give up farming.
on protecting the institution of slavery.
Wealthy planters
Tidewater planters were wealthy, slave-owning farmers who cultivated cash crops like tobacco and rice on large plantations near coastal areas, while backcountry farmers were typically poorer, subsistence farmers who lived inland and grew crops for their own consumption. Tidewater planters had closer economic ties to England and were more influenced by British culture, while backcountry farmers tended to be more self-sufficient and resistant to outside influences. Socially, tidewater planters were part of the Southern aristocracy, while backcountry farmers were more egalitarian and independent.
small farmers formed the majority of the southern population, the planters controlled much of the south's economy.
Tidewater planters were wealthy, relied on enslaved labor, and cultivated cash crops like tobacco and rice in the coastal regions. Backcountry farmers were more self-sufficient, lived in the inland areas, and grew crops for subsistence rather than for trade. They often had smaller farms and a more independent lifestyle compared to the planters.
Rich white plantation owners and they're control of slaves and cotton.
People were either wealthy planters who owned large sucsesful plantations or the were poor white farmers. but most of the population was made up by slaves.
Wealthy planters i believe.
Birmingham,Al
After the US Civil War, many poor white farmers became sharecroppers, farming land owned by the wealthy planters in exchange for a percentage of their crop's yield.
Cottonocracy
Birmingham,Al
the wealthy french planters