Two reasons why data might not support a hypothesis are that the experiment had a flaw or was not repeated enough times. This happens a lot.
Two reasons why data might not support a hypothesis are that the experiment had a flaw or was not repeated enough times. This happens a lot.
Two reasons why data might not support a hypothesis are that the experiment had a flaw or was not repeated enough times. This happens a lot.
i like 69 in the but
An experiment might not support a hypothesis even if the hypothesis is correct because if the conclusion
A better explanation might exist.
A better explanation might exist.
A better explanation might exist.
A better explanation might exist.
you need to ask ----> Does my conclusion support my hypothesis?
There are two reasons on why people might support trial by jury. The jury is needed for trials because if if the jury is not convinced with the case then there is no more case if they are convinced then it is a win win case.
It ultimately depends on what your theory is. Sometimes the fact that your data doesn't support your hypothesis means that the theory from which the hypothesis was derived was altogether wrong and is therefore discarded. Other times it might just mean a simple modification of the original theory, to accommodate the new-found evidence.The most important thing to remember is that your data will not always support your hypothesis, and in the event that such happens, you end learning a whole lot more.A.B.C.D.its A
The question is very poorly specified so this answer is simply a wild guess at what the questioner might want. Three possible outcomes of any research, designed to test some hypothesis, are: (a) evidence in support of the hypothesis; (b) evidence disproving the hypothesis; or (c) evidence that can neither prove (support) nor disprove the hypothesis.