can, could, will do, capable
Most jacks use oil and not water so nothing adverse would happen.
use yougurt insteat of coconut
Could is the past form of can. (Sometimes was/were able to is used instead of could.)
Able to solve new questions (not previously encountered). Able to learn from previous experience.
"Can" doesn't have a specific future tense.You could use "be able to" instead for the future tense.Although "can" is the accepted answer, "able" would be a better used wordThe word "could" works well for past and future tense as in "he would if he could"
Can is when you are expressing that you are able to do something at that time. Could is when you are expressing that you had the chance to or a choice to do something. Could is used mostly for past tense and and future tense while can is used mostly for the present.
It was able to provide a lot of food and the skins could be used for clothing and blankets.
radium
ARE you able (to)?
There could be a number of reasons this could happen, like a bacterial infection. You could also have kidney or bladder stones.
"Dile ke able" is not a phrase that is commonly used in English, so it does not have a specific translation. It could be a misspelling or a phrase in a different language.
The construction is redundant: "Could not" means the same as "not able to." You might use the form "would not be able to" or simply "could not" or "cannot" which are all roughly the same with some connotations that vary by tense. Note that "could not" is the past tense but also colloquially used to say "will not be able to" in the future. All of these mean that something "cannot" be done (impossible), but in many cases it is a choice not to act. You should correctly use "may not" when something is prohibited, or "will not" when it is your choice not to.