University California vs. Bakke or the bakke case
University California vs. Bakke or the bakke case
University California vs. Bakke or the bakke case
The Supreme Court mandated that an immigration quota system was unconstitutional
The Supreme Court decisions that declared quota systems unconstitutional while allowing other forms of affirmative action include Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978) and Grutter v. Bollinger (2003). In Bakke, the Court ruled that the specific quota system used by the University of California was unconstitutional, but it did not outlaw affirmative action entirely. Similarly, in Grutter, the Court upheld the use of race as one factor in admissions processes, emphasizing a holistic review approach rather than fixed quotas.
That would depend on which quota systems you were asking about (you have not made this clear in your question), I do not oppose quota systems in general but made do so in specific cases.
The quota system in college admissions has traditionally been an effort to increase diversity and remedy past discrimination. One of the effects has been an increased enrollment of racial minorities and women into colleges. Another effect has been increasing grumblings from other sectors of the public who believe the quota system is a form of favoritism.
World War 1 led to an increase in immigration restrictions and tighter border controls in many countries. Many countries focused on national security and limited the entry of foreigners, particularly those from enemy countries. This resulted in a decrease in overall immigration during and immediately after the war.
Regents of University of California v. Bakke
a quota.
sales volume quota ,expense quota, profit quota, activity quota
sales volume quota ,expense quota, profit quota, activity quota
sales volume quota ,expense quota, profit quota, activity quota