Gideon v. Wainwright
Gideon v. Wainwright
Gideon v. wainwright
Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963)
the sixth amendment requires the states to provide defense attorneys to defendants accused of felonies if they cannot afford their own
The accused did not get lawyers because they couldn't afford them. There was no law that would get you a lawyer if you couldn't.
it guarantees a person who has been accused of a crime the right to a layer even if he/she cant afford one.
Every state in the U.S. is required to provide a lawyer to people who cannot afford one.
He or she does not have the right to ask for a specific lawyer. If you cannot afford one you get what they give you, and if you deem the counsel you were given "incompetent" you can appeal your case if you were not acquitted. this is just one of the many rights that they don't have, but there are a lot of rights that can be waved.Added:An accused is guaranteed ONLY those rights which are enumerated.Anything else, regardless of WHATEVER it may be, is not guaranteed.Short answer: If it is not enumerated in the Constitution, Statute, or by Court decision, then, ergo, it is not "guaranteed."
A person accused of a crime must be offered a lawyer. If the person can't afford a lawyer, the courts will appoint one for free.
You would need to provide more information, such as where the dress you are looking at is being sold, so that it can be determined if somewhere else is selling it for a lower price.
The noun 'decision' is a count noun; the plural form is decisions.Example: You have two decisions to make, do you want to go and can you afford to go.
In a capital-istic economic system, distribution is often determined by wealth. If two people have the same wants, the person who can most afford something will be able to acquire it.
Gideon v. Wainwright-NovaNET