0
The defenses are varied. There is the most simple defense of "I didn't do it". From that can flow alibi defenses or lack of proof defenses. The term defense is a bit of a misnomer in that legally the defendant does not have an obligation to prove anything. It is the government's obligation to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. To that end, the defense often brings up issues to raise doubt about the state's case, possibly providing an alternative theory with a different suspect. Then there is the issue of affirmative defenses such as self-defense or entrapment. For further discussion see the related links below.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoWitnesses, records, documents, photographs, recordings that relate to the case may be presented.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Can the intent requirement has no bearing on the defenses available to the defendant in a criminal trial?
in certain crimes the intent required to be proven determines whether particular defenses are available to the defendant--pg 93 Criminal Law & Procedure, Scheb
In a criminal trial who has the burden of proving criminal defenses?
The Prosecution (the State) presents the case against the defendant. The Defense Attorney has to provide the defenses.
What are the defenses in an intentional tort case?
Common defenses in an intentional tort case include consent (plaintiff agreed to the harmful act), self-defense (defendant acted to protect themselves from harm), defense of others (defendant acted to protect someone else), and defense of property (defendant acted to protect their property from harm).
What one thing can't the defendant do when answering a complaint A deny the complaint's allegations B list defenses C admit to the complaint's allegations D defer answering for 180 days?
list defenses
Are there defenses for strict liability?
Yes, defenses for strict liability typically include: Assumption of risk by the plaintiff Product misuse by the plaintiff Contributory negligence by the plaintiff Lack of causation between the defendant's conduct and the harm suffered
What is negligence defences?
Negligence defenses are legal arguments used to refute or minimize liability in a negligence claim. Common defenses may include contributory negligence, assumption of risk, or lack of duty. These defenses aim to show that the defendant should not be held responsible for the plaintiff's injuries due to various reasons.
Which are the defenses under insanity?
There are two common defenses under insanity: the M'Naghten rule and the irresistible impulse test. The M'Naghten rule focuses on whether the defendant understood what they were doing and whether they knew it was wrong. The irresistible impulse test, on the other hand, focuses on whether the defendant can control their actions due to a mental disease or defect. Other jurisdictions may have additional defenses or variations of these two tests.
What would be affirmative defenses in an unjust enrichment case?
One of the critical affirmative defenses would be the voluntary payment doctrine. Check to see if this doctrine is available in your jurisdiction.
Waiver of jurisdictional defenses?
I believe this falls under 'change of venue'. A defendant or the prosecution may ask a judge to change the venue or to change the jurisdiction where the case is being prosecuted. This may be the case if a defendant believes he may get a fair trial. A jurisdictional defense is one based on whether the court has jurisdiction over the defendant. For example, if one has to be personally served but was served by some other, unauthorized means, the court may not have jurisdiction over that person. In other words that person has a jurisdictional defense to the action. If however, the person appears in court and does not raise the jurisdiction issue, he/she has waived that defense. Here's how this plays out. A plaintiff claims to have served a defendant with process. Once the defendant does not answer within the time prescribed by law, the plaintiff would then move for a default judgment. The defendant become aware of the default judgment when the plaintiff attempts to execute on it (e.g., restrain his bank account...) The defendant then files a motion/order to show cause asking the court to vacate the default judgment. The plaintiff agrees to vacate the judgment provided the defendant "waives jurisdictional defenses,"i.e. lack of personal service.
What is the first step for the defendant named in a Writ of Prohibition to do after it is filed?
The defendant should review the Writ of Prohibition to understand the allegations and reasons for it being filed. It is advisable to consult with an attorney experienced in handling such matters to discuss the next steps and potential defenses. It may also be necessary to prepare a response or motion to challenge the Writ.
Why are the defenses of provocation and diminished responsibility only available for murder?
you should probably let you client know this is where you get legal advice...
What is the difference between absolute and strict liability?
In strict liability, there are certain defenses available whereas in absolute liability, there are none.
