One of the critical affirmative defenses would be the voluntary payment doctrine. Check to see if this doctrine is available in your jurisdiction.
Few men would be cruel and unjust to a cripple.
No. That would mean the third party tortfeasor would pay twice, which would amount to unjust enrichment.
Robert Nozick, a libertarian philosopher known for his entitlement theory of justice, would likely oppose affirmative action. He argued that justice in holdings is based on individual rights and voluntary exchanges, emphasizing that redistribution of resources to achieve equality undermines personal freedom. Nozick's focus on individual merit and the protection of property rights suggests that he would view affirmative action as a form of unjust interference in the marketplace of ideas and opportunities.
The opposite of affirmative (yes) would be negative (no).
If they were the only plaintiff in the case, no it would not. The case would be dismissed, unless someone else who had "standing" in the case came forward to re-file the action in their own name.
affirmative
The Herald warns that if the demands are unjust, he would suffer the punishment from the gods.
I would say False
The doctrine of equitable restitution is a legal principle that allows a party to recover benefits conferred upon another when it would be unjust for the recipient to retain those benefits without compensating the provider. This doctrine is often applied in cases where no formal contract exists, or when a contract is unenforceable. Equitable restitution aims to prevent unjust enrichment, ensuring that one party does not unfairly benefit at the expense of another. Courts may impose this remedy to achieve fairness and uphold justice in various situations.
A responsive pleading is an answer, where you respond to each allegation made in the petition or complaint. You would also then assert any affirmative defenses or counterclaims. Start by researching the law under which you are being sued. If you are unable to properly draft it by yourself, you should speak with a lawyer.
Media is always more enriching with more than one form, so a single medium would rarely if ever function as differentiation and enrichment.
Many who really know the game would answer in the affirmative. Yes.