One of the critical affirmative defenses would be the voluntary payment doctrine. Check to see if this doctrine is available in your jurisdiction.
Few men would be cruel and unjust to a cripple.
No. That would mean the third party tortfeasor would pay twice, which would amount to unjust enrichment.
The opposite of affirmative (yes) would be negative (no).
If they were the only plaintiff in the case, no it would not. The case would be dismissed, unless someone else who had "standing" in the case came forward to re-file the action in their own name.
The Herald warns that if the demands are unjust, he would suffer the punishment from the gods.
affirmative
I would say False
A responsive pleading is an answer, where you respond to each allegation made in the petition or complaint. You would also then assert any affirmative defenses or counterclaims. Start by researching the law under which you are being sued. If you are unable to properly draft it by yourself, you should speak with a lawyer.
Media is always more enriching with more than one form, so a single medium would rarely if ever function as differentiation and enrichment.
For religious freedom and to avoid unjust taxation.
He was a great ruler, but his attitude was unjust to the power he had conqured
Many who really know the game would answer in the affirmative. Yes.