Few men would be cruel and unjust to a cripple.
Most men would be kind and just to a cripple .
Many men could be kind to an animal.
Affirmative - Few men would be cruel and unjust to a cripple
The opposite of affirmative (yes) would be negative (no).
i dont know
Strict is a word meaning less than harsh or cruel.
Unjust law is a phrase used to describe a group or someone of power who enforces a law but does not obey the law themselves. An example would be a police officer who speeds for no reason or does not use their seatbelt.
The form of "cruel" that would be considered an abstract noun would be "cruelty".
One of the critical affirmative defenses would be the voluntary payment doctrine. Check to see if this doctrine is available in your jurisdiction.
Simply because it is harmful, cruel, unjust, and inhumane. When these animals are rescued they have to be uthanizedbecause of they were raised to fight. If not they would pose a threat to the public people. That's why it's illegal.
The opposite of affirmative (yes) would be negative (no).
The Herald warns that if the demands are unjust, he would suffer the punishment from the gods.
affirmative
i dont know
the world would be peacful in most ways.
The word you are looking for is "Aye Aye," which is often used as a military or naval command to show acknowledgment or agreement.
"Pooled" or "fooled" would rhyme with "cruel."
Strict is a word meaning less than harsh or cruel.
Scott was likely referring to the idea of causing harm to something innocent and harmless, which is similar to killing a mockingbirdβan innocent creature that brings beauty and joy. It suggests that the action would be unjust and cruel, with no justification.
I would like to know if Egyptians had cruel puishment and if they did what are them?