0
What describes an advantage that secondary sources have over primary sources for historians?
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What advantage do secondary sources have over primary sources for historians?
they can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted
Why are secondary sources important to historians?
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
How do historians use primary and secondary sources?
A primary source is like a diary of somebody that has experienced something or the person them self (autobiography) A secondary source is when somebody has heard the story and retells it or writes about it. (biography) A primary source is the most reliable because information can be lost or changed by a secondary source so historians favor primary sources.
Which best explains why secondary sources are important to historians?
(Apex) They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
How do historians investigate history?
Present day historians investigate the histories already written by: * checking the resources used by historians who have written about a particular subject; * by investigating any sources that were overlooked; and * searching primary, secondary leads that may bring to light new sources of historical information.
Which historical term describes the specific primary and secondary sources that historians use to support their claims?
Historical evidence.
What advantage do secondary sources have over primary sources for historians?
they can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted
What tools do historians use?
Primary sources, secondary sources, and oral history.
What tools do historians?
historians use primary soucres and secondary sources
Are primary sources or secondary sources more valuable to modern historians?
secondary
Why do historians have to evaluate the primary and the secondary sources they used to answer their questions?
to be happy
Why do historians have to evaluate primary and secondary sources they use to answer their questions?
to be happy
Why do historians have to evaluate the primary secondary sources they use to answer their question?
to be happy
Why do historians have to evaluate the primary and secondary sources they used to answer questions?
to be happy
What are the two sources that historians use?
primary sources and secondary sources.
What source do historians use to answer questions?
They use primary and secondary sources
Are secondary sources important to historians?
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
