With all due respect to some people's understanding of history, James Cook did not do anything to "help find Australia". European explorers had discovered and even landed on Australia's shores well over 150 years before Cook ever charted the east coast. Refer to the related question below.
Neither.James Cook first landed in Botany Bay, and this is the site he recommended for colonisation.
James Cook (not a captain a this stage, but a Lieutenant) explored the eastern coast of Australia in the HMS Bark Endeavour. He did not 'find' or discover Australia, as the Dutch had already discovered the land over 150 years before Cook arrived.
James Cook did not discover Australia. He was the first to chart the eastern coast, doing so in 1770, when he was 41 years old, but Australia was first "discovered" by Dutch explorer Willem Jansz in 1606.
Because he was the first person to find Australia and anyway's it's also history.
The English sea captain Captain James Cook was most known for being the first European to find the eastern coast of Australia, as well as eliminating the rumor of a great southern continent among with other things.
No. To begin with, Cook did not "find" Australia. the continent had been discovered over 150 years before Cook sailed. Also, there was no way to send a letter from an unsettled region. England only heard of Cook's charting of the east coast once Cook returned to England.
That was Captain James Cook on his second voyage to the Pacific Ocean.
Lieutenant James Cook (not yet a captain) chose Botany Bay as the most promising site for a new settlement.it is interesting to note that, when the First Fleet arrived eighteen years later, Captain Arthur Phillip did not find Botany Bay to be at all as Cook had described. He was forced to reconnoitre north in order to find a more suitable prospect.
Captain James Cook did not actually find any countries. He was the first to chart the eastern coast of Australia, and he was the first to circumnavigate New Zealand. However, he did not find either of these countries. He was the first European to come across Hawaii, which he called the Sandwich Islands, but they do not constitute a "country".
Yes and no. Cook was instructed to search for the great southern continent. He found the east coast of Australia, although the western half of the continent had already been found, but the continent was not the huge land mass he was expecting to find.
Captain Cook did not find Australia. Dutch explorers had discovered the Australian continent in 1616, and named it "New Holland". Because the Dutch were not really interested in exploring the land, it remained unknown. Therefore, on early maps it was referred to as "Terra Australis Incognita" - "The Unknown South Land".