answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Clausewitz wrote that all great commanders have acted on instinct, and the fact that their instinct was usually correct was part of their innate greatness and a measure of their genius. Clearly Napoleon was a military genius. And he acted on instinct or the trusted instinct of his best generals. For example, when a new senior officer was nominated for a generalship, Napoleon asked the nominators this question: "Is the man lucky"?Proper instinct would be tested in such cases.

User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What did Carl Von Clausewitz believe about a commander's use of instinct in warfare?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

What are some of the interpretations of the word Trinity in the works of military theorist Carl von Clausewitz?

Because Carl von Clausewitz died before completing all of his works on warfare, many of the beliefs he had that were part of the foundation of his works are subject to multiple meanings. For example, Clausewitz's reference to the Trinity. Many people assume that he borrowed the trinity concept from Christianity and used the term simply to emphasize certain points in his methodology concerning warfare. To some readers, the Trinity for Clausewitz meant the people, the army and the government. For others, they believe he was speaking of violence, chance and reason.


What caused Lenin to study the works of military theorist Carl von Clausewitz?

Lenin turned to the works of military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz in 1915. Lenin was not that interested in military strategy or tactics. What many people overlook is that Clausewitz paid attention to war time politics and the role of warfare in relation to the masses. In some of Lenin's writings he copied verbatim some of Clausewitz's observations on how the politics of a nation interacted with wars.


What were significant differences between military theorists Clausewitz and Johmini?

Both military theorists, Clausewitz and Johmini wrote about the Napoleonic era wars, their publications contained significant differences. Clausewitz is almost in a metaphysical mode in his publication of ON War. He assumes the reader is already familiar with Henri Johmini. Johmini expressed his view on the geometrical rules for warfare. With that said, perhaps the most significant differences between them were their views on the relative power of offensive and defense. Clausewitz clearly emphasizes the power of tactical defense, while Johmini leans toward tactical offensives.


What did Carl von Clausewitz believe was the key to the successful destruction of a defeated army?

Military theorist, Carl von Clausewitz wrote his works on warfare based on the Prussian wars and the Napoleonic era wars. He observations determined that very often a defeated army could maneuver a successful retreat and live to fight another day. This was frequently the result of US Civil War battles. For Clausewitz, a strong cavalry was the key to the pursuit required to hamper an enemy army's retreat. In the US Civil War, the value of cavalry troops were lessened due to the firepower of rifles. Therefore, no effective pursuit of a defeated army was available.


Did Nathanael Greene use guerrilla warfare?

well if you believe he did he did

Related questions

What did the 18th Century general Clausewitz claim were the three core values that drove warfare?

Clausewitz claimed that wars were driven by chance, passion and rationality.


When was the classic warfare text titled On War published by Carl Von Clausewitz?

On War by Carl Von Clausewitz was available in Europe in 1832, its publication date.


What are some of the interpretations of the word Trinity in the works of military theorist Carl von Clausewitz?

Because Carl von Clausewitz died before completing all of his works on warfare, many of the beliefs he had that were part of the foundation of his works are subject to multiple meanings. For example, Clausewitz's reference to the Trinity. Many people assume that he borrowed the trinity concept from Christianity and used the term simply to emphasize certain points in his methodology concerning warfare. To some readers, the Trinity for Clausewitz meant the people, the army and the government. For others, they believe he was speaking of violence, chance and reason.


What is a major difference between the published works on warfare of Carl Von Clausewitz and Henri Johmini?

One major difference between Carl Von Clausewitz and Henri Johmini is the fact that Clausewitz writes more on how politics and military strategies are linked. Johmini tends to shy away from this angle of warfare and is more concerned with purely military tactics and strategy. As an aside, Vladimir Lenin studied Clausewitz because Clausewitz speaks to what Lenin wanted to learn. That being how military strategies and political goals are inter related.


What is an often overlooked aspect of Carl von Clausewitz's works on warfare?

Many readers of the works of military theorist Carl von Clausewitz are often surprised at his use of metaphysics and actual religious concepts. As just one example of this, Clausewitz refers to the Trinity, the Christian trinity, when speaking about war and the people of a nation involved in one.


What caused Lenin to study the works of military theorist Carl von Clausewitz?

Lenin turned to the works of military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz in 1915. Lenin was not that interested in military strategy or tactics. What many people overlook is that Clausewitz paid attention to war time politics and the role of warfare in relation to the masses. In some of Lenin's writings he copied verbatim some of Clausewitz's observations on how the politics of a nation interacted with wars.


Who was Carl von Clausewitz?

Carl Von Clausewitz (1780 - 1831) was a Prussian soldier best known for his military treatise, 'Von Kriege' (On War) and the famous quote, "war is the continuation of politics by other means". Clausewitz learned allot about warfare by participating in Prussian wars under Frederick the Great. His excellent publication called "On War" is still a widely read book on warfare. In fact his ideas concerning culmination points appeared in a US Army Field manual as late as 1982. Clausewitz and Henri Jomini had a degree of influence on the commanding officers on both sides of the US Civil War.


What did military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz believe was the best way to gain a decisive victory against an enemy?

Military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz wrote extensively about warfare, its tactics and strategies. He was aware of how difficult it was to obtain a decisive victory against an enemy based on his experience with the Prussian wars in Europe. For Clausewitz, the keys to destroying an enemy army were often built around advancing and assaulting an enemy with maximum speed to damage the enemy's main army and then to aggressively pursue the enemy's retreating forces.


What were significant differences between military theorists Clausewitz and Johmini?

Both military theorists, Clausewitz and Johmini wrote about the Napoleonic era wars, their publications contained significant differences. Clausewitz is almost in a metaphysical mode in his publication of ON War. He assumes the reader is already familiar with Henri Johmini. Johmini expressed his view on the geometrical rules for warfare. With that said, perhaps the most significant differences between them were their views on the relative power of offensive and defense. Clausewitz clearly emphasizes the power of tactical defense, while Johmini leans toward tactical offensives.


What did Carl von Clausewitz believe was the key to the successful destruction of a defeated army?

Military theorist, Carl von Clausewitz wrote his works on warfare based on the Prussian wars and the Napoleonic era wars. He observations determined that very often a defeated army could maneuver a successful retreat and live to fight another day. This was frequently the result of US Civil War battles. For Clausewitz, a strong cavalry was the key to the pursuit required to hamper an enemy army's retreat. In the US Civil War, the value of cavalry troops were lessened due to the firepower of rifles. Therefore, no effective pursuit of a defeated army was available.


What did military theorist Henri Jomini believe about guerrilla warfare?

Johmini believed that guerrilla warfare could be effective when an invading army was faced by a united people determined to sustain their independence and not bend to the will of the attackers. People in arms as guerrillas can be effectively aided by the terrain of their nation. Nations with mountainous and forested territory present a constant threat to the enemy invaders. Ideally, guerrillas are most effective if they support their nations own regular army. Military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz basically agreed with the ideas of Jomini on this part of warfare.


Are there cheats for modern warfare?

I dont't believe there are cheats for Modern Warfare 2. There are glitches though.