purchasers of English goods
I think that an alternative to the Indian Removal Act would have been Jefferson's first thoughts about civilized Indians, although I myself, feel that the Indians way of life would have been more than fine even with the expansion of the U.S, letting them co exist if the Indians could adapt to agricultural lifestyles would have been better than eradicating them from their home land.
The difference ebetween being civilized and uncivilized is manners. A civilized person would grow up in a nice home and be taught to do "appropriate" things and behave "human". As of being uncivilized though is that you would have grown up in a poor family, have no famous or rich person in your family, or have any way of life other than being yourself. These varied as different because civilized people went to the trouble of ignoring uncivilized people while uncivilized people didn't care.
He thought the Indians would turn him over to Montcalm.
yes very much so
the Algonquian Indians played a game called lacrosse had a racket and a ball.some-one would through the ball and all the others would try to catch it with there racket.who-ever caught the ball would through it next.thats how the Algonquian Indians played lacrosse.
The reason Hakluyt thinks the Indians of North America will welcome English colonizers as bearers of liberty is because they would be rescued from Spain's hold. Hakluyt believes that English colonization in America would have enough influence to compete with Spain on labor, goods, and religion. Knowing that the Indians would like to escape Spain's grip gives enough reason to believe they would think as the English colonizers as bearers of liberty.
Yes
Yes
He thought colonies would provide markets for England's goods.
I think that an alternative to the Indian Removal Act would have been Jefferson's first thoughts about civilized Indians, although I myself, feel that the Indians way of life would have been more than fine even with the expansion of the U.S, letting them co exist if the Indians could adapt to agricultural lifestyles would have been better than eradicating them from their home land.
Malthus would argue no. Henry George would argue yes.
argue is the main verb. Can is an auxiliary verb
No, the word argue is a verb. Argument would be the equivalent noun.
You can not make that argument since they are not alive. It would be like trying to argue that a bike is a space ship.
against it
Some would argue that it is Dwayne Wade still others would argue that is Lebron James. My answer is Dwayne Wade.
yes Muslim people are way better than Indians, according to some people Some would argue that no people are better than any others. People are difficult to compare. Actually, comparing a Muslim to an Indian is like comparing an infectuous disease to a dirty sock. You cant do it.