0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
James II was the Protestant English king who believed in absolute rule?
its true.
What was the causes of the glorious revolution?
James II became a Catholic and tried to rule Britain without Parliament. (APEX) James II believed in a strong monarchy with absolute power.
What was parliaments problem with James II that led to glorious revolution?
James II believed in a strong monarchy with absolute power. apexx he became a catholic and tried to rule britaiin without parliament (:
What was parliaments problem that led James ii to the glorious revolution?
James II believed in a strong monarchy with absolute power. apexx he became a catholic and tried to rule britaiin without parliament (:
What type of government did Charles II rule?
absolute monarchy
What was parliaments problem with James that led the glorious revolution?
James II believed in a strong monarchy with absolute power. apexx he became a catholic and tried to rule britaiin without parliament (:
What was the parliaments problem with James II during the glorious revolution?
James II believed in a strong monarchy with absolute power.and the goverment didnt belive in things that he did and because of thst they had more and more problems with him.he became a catholic and tried to rule britain without parliament
Why were absolute monarchs needed?
Absolute monarchs were not needed. It simply happened. When Charles I became an absolute monarch, he lost his head. When James II of England became an absolute monarch, he escaped England with his life. No one was willing to fight on his behalf. Kings simply try to gain more power for themselves just as presidents do.
What was Parliaments problems with James II that led to the Glorious Revolution?
James II believed in a strong monarchy with absolute power. apexx he became a catholic and tried to rule britaiin without parliament (:
What Philip II's anti-Protestant policies did NOT lead to?
The belief in his divine right to rule as an absolute monarch was not a result of Philip II's protestant policies.
Philip II's anti-protestant policies did not lead to what?
The belief in his divine right to rule as an absolute monarch was not a result of Philip II's protestant policies.
Why is Charles ii important?
He was the first English King that could not rule with absolute command. His power was split with Parliament's.
