answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.

Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.

Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.

Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.

Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.

Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.

Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.

Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.

Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What did Julius Caesar lose being king?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

Did Julius Caesar lose an arm in battle?

No, Julius Caesar never lost any body part in battle.


What happened to Julius Caesar that caused him to lose his throne and when?

Julius Caesar never had a throne. The closest he came to a throne was an ivory chair that he was allowed to use. If by "throne" you mean his power, he lost it when he was stabbed to death. He was killed on March 15, 44 BC. This date is known as the Ides of March, a day/date in the Roman calendar.


How did Augustus lose his power?

Along with his death, also went his power.


What was Julius Caesar story as emperor of rome?

Julius Caesar was never an emperor of Rome. He was basically a Roman politician who rose through the elected offices to counsul. After his counsulship he was given the supreme military command in Gaul, where he proved his generalship. His political enemies in Rome were out to destroy him and rather than lose everything he started a civil war in which he was victorious. He was made dictator, the highest office the senate could confer on a man, and when the senate extended his dictatorship for life, he was assassinated. Never in all his extraordinary career was he an emperor.


Was Julius Caesar actually a great leader or was he a tyrant?

Well, the Optimates, or the senatorial party that was against Caesar would say that he was being very unfair, but that was because they had a lot to lose if his reforms were passed. The Populares, or the Caesarian party thought he was being very just and fair, especially in his proposals for debt and land reform. So as for the question of "fairness" it all depends on which faction you think was right. However, at the end of his life, Caesar became very arrogant and actually insulted the senate and Roman custom. So in this aspect you could say he was tyrannical.

Related questions

Did Julius Caesar lose an arm in battle?

No, Julius Caesar never lost any body part in battle.


Why didn't Julius Caesar lose a single war?

at the time julius caesar had a country who was at the top , the roman empire was feared and with julius caesar's brains, plus his sense of leadership drove him to victory until his people betared him.


What takes place with Cassius and Brutus troops in Julius Caesar?

They lose the battle.


How did the citizens of the roman republic lose their democracy and become ruled by dictators?

The citizens of the Roman republic did not lose their democracy and become ruled by dictators. Their democracy was alive and well (although at the mercy of politics) until the time of Julius Caesar. Before Caesar, all the dictators resigned after their purpose was achieved -- even Sulla resigned. Caesar, however, was the exception and he received his honors and dictatorship from the fawning senate.The citizens of the Roman republic did not lose their democracy and become ruled by dictators. Their democracy was alive and well (although at the mercy of politics) until the time of Julius Caesar. Before Caesar, all the dictators resigned after their purpose was achieved -- even Sulla resigned. Caesar, however, was the exception and he received his honors and dictatorship from the fawning senate.The citizens of the Roman republic did not lose their democracy and become ruled by dictators. Their democracy was alive and well (although at the mercy of politics) until the time of Julius Caesar. Before Caesar, all the dictators resigned after their purpose was achieved -- even Sulla resigned. Caesar, however, was the exception and he received his honors and dictatorship from the fawning senate.The citizens of the Roman republic did not lose their democracy and become ruled by dictators. Their democracy was alive and well (although at the mercy of politics) until the time of Julius Caesar. Before Caesar, all the dictators resigned after their purpose was achieved -- even Sulla resigned. Caesar, however, was the exception and he received his honors and dictatorship from the fawning senate.The citizens of the Roman republic did not lose their democracy and become ruled by dictators. Their democracy was alive and well (although at the mercy of politics) until the time of Julius Caesar. Before Caesar, all the dictators resigned after their purpose was achieved -- even Sulla resigned. Caesar, however, was the exception and he received his honors and dictatorship from the fawning senate.The citizens of the Roman republic did not lose their democracy and become ruled by dictators. Their democracy was alive and well (although at the mercy of politics) until the time of Julius Caesar. Before Caesar, all the dictators resigned after their purpose was achieved -- even Sulla resigned. Caesar, however, was the exception and he received his honors and dictatorship from the fawning senate.The citizens of the Roman republic did not lose their democracy and become ruled by dictators. Their democracy was alive and well (although at the mercy of politics) until the time of Julius Caesar. Before Caesar, all the dictators resigned after their purpose was achieved -- even Sulla resigned. Caesar, however, was the exception and he received his honors and dictatorship from the fawning senate.The citizens of the Roman republic did not lose their democracy and become ruled by dictators. Their democracy was alive and well (although at the mercy of politics) until the time of Julius Caesar. Before Caesar, all the dictators resigned after their purpose was achieved -- even Sulla resigned. Caesar, however, was the exception and he received his honors and dictatorship from the fawning senate.The citizens of the Roman republic did not lose their democracy and become ruled by dictators. Their democracy was alive and well (although at the mercy of politics) until the time of Julius Caesar. Before Caesar, all the dictators resigned after their purpose was achieved -- even Sulla resigned. Caesar, however, was the exception and he received his honors and dictatorship from the fawning senate.


What happened to Julius Caesar that caused him to lose his throne and when?

Julius Caesar never had a throne. The closest he came to a throne was an ivory chair that he was allowed to use. If by "throne" you mean his power, he lost it when he was stabbed to death. He was killed on March 15, 44 BC. This date is known as the Ides of March, a day/date in the Roman calendar.


Who was behind the assassination of Julius Caesar and gracchi brothers?

Although the Gracchii and Caesar lived at different times, the senate was behind the assassinations in both instances. In the case of the Gracchii, the upper classes stood to lose land, wealth and their livelihoods. In Caesar's case the assassins were trying to save the republic.


Who suggested that Marc anotony also be killed Julius Caesar?

In Scene 2, Decius Brutus raised a brow over whether only Julius Caesar was the only one who had to be killed. Cassius replied,'well urged, decius.' Then he gave the idea to Brutus that along with Caesar, Antony must also be killed lest he should use the resources at his disposal to them any harm. But, Brutus considered Mark Antony as a 'helpless limb' of Caesar who shall lose his control on the death of his dearest friend and can do nothing except for either laughing at it or harming his own self.


How did Augustus lose his power?

Along with his death, also went his power.


What was Julius Caesar story as emperor of rome?

Julius Caesar was never an emperor of Rome. He was basically a Roman politician who rose through the elected offices to counsul. After his counsulship he was given the supreme military command in Gaul, where he proved his generalship. His political enemies in Rome were out to destroy him and rather than lose everything he started a civil war in which he was victorious. He was made dictator, the highest office the senate could confer on a man, and when the senate extended his dictatorship for life, he was assassinated. Never in all his extraordinary career was he an emperor.


Was Julius Caesar actually a great leader or was he a tyrant?

Well, the Optimates, or the senatorial party that was against Caesar would say that he was being very unfair, but that was because they had a lot to lose if his reforms were passed. The Populares, or the Caesarian party thought he was being very just and fair, especially in his proposals for debt and land reform. So as for the question of "fairness" it all depends on which faction you think was right. However, at the end of his life, Caesar became very arrogant and actually insulted the senate and Roman custom. So in this aspect you could say he was tyrannical.


Why did Julius Caesar's rise to power frighten many people in rome?

Brutus (and Cassius) felt that if Caesar became the Emperor or King of Rome, they and the Romans would lose the freedomthey had fought for back when Rome began. They claimed that they only killed Caesar to protect their freedom (as no one wants to be under the rule of a dictator) but later on Rome had an Emperor. Brutus fears Caesar's growing power because Caesar, his former enemy, would become too high in power and I guess he felt unsafe (this is just a guess of mine), and once again, the Romans would lose their freedom. No one knows his real intentions as there wasn't a diary or his life was recorded down.I will highlight the answer in bold.


When did Julius Caesar rule Egypt?

it was 49B.C. to 44B.C.Julius Caesar's "reign"ofifcially began after the battle of Pharsalus, when he defeated Pompey in the civil war, in 48 BC. However before the final battle he had already obtained a great deal of power.