Most of the jobs that the Roman had were similar to the jobs we have today but they did not have automation as we know it and most things had to be done by hand. Slaves were trained to do specific tasks for the wealthy, but the lower classes could also do the same work. For example, a poor man could hire himself out as a laborer of some sort during a special need, such as a barge having to be unloaded, or harvest or planting time on some farm. Yes, farms had slaves to do the work, but it was more economical for the farm manager to hire a free man for, say a harvest, than to purchase a slave that would not be needed for the rest of the year.
Laundry services were always in demand, and again, although the wealthy had slaves to take care of their wardrobes, others generally "sent out the wash" to their local laundress.
There were many bars and fast food establishments and many bakeries. Skilled craftsmen or women would have their own shops and the artists such as the sculptors, woodworkers, mosaic workers and fresco painters would contract independently with a client.
So, the job market really hasn't changed much in 2,000 years.
silk robes
tons
i don't know why do you need to know anyway? ? ? I'm confused ? ? ?
The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.
No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.
Slavery was an institution in every ancient civilization and culture. The Romans were no exception. Slavery was an ancient fact of life. The Romans used their slaves to handle various jobs and responsibilities, freeing up the owner to do other things and to accomplish more. The Romans depended on their slaves and trusted them with their money, their children, their businesses, and their households.
Ancient Romans. No
It depended upon what that job was.
For getting good jobs in the future.
rome was a grate ary
The Romans took many properties of important Greek gods and gave them new names and slightly different jobs.
i don't know why do you need to know anyway? ? ? I'm confused ? ? ?
It is difficult to give this question a specific answer because the Romans used all sort of different equipment for all sort of different jobs.
They had many jobs being a populations that varied between small villages and the great city of Rome itself that gave the Roman people their name. One might be philosopher, farmer, solider, mother, father and student all jobs to which we echo to this day.
Poor Romans were integral part of Roman civilisation. Without the jobs they did Rome would not have built her great buidings, the Colosseum, the circuses, the arches, the theatres and amphitheatres, the villas, the roads, the ports, the aqueducts, and all the other trademarks of Roman civilisation.
Ancient Romans did almost the same jobs as the ones we have today. They were bakers, booksellers, doctors, accountants, tax collectors, farmers and sailors, as well as many other common occupations.Ancient Romans did almost the same jobs as the ones we have today. They were bakers, booksellers, doctors, accountants, tax collectors, farmers and sailors, as well as many other common occupations.
The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".
The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.
The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.