Want this question answered?
it didnt
they didnt alter the land they simply stopped roming and setup river valley civilizations
if the higher social standing people didnt surpress the lower class they wouldn't of had the back bone they needed to make it an empire. the lower class woul dbe free to do as the pleased. and that wouldn't be in the best intrest of the empire of those who didnt have to work to survive
The early agriculural civilizations had just about everyone helping farm or contribute in some way to agriculture. Classical empires had enough people and land so that food could be mass produced and others could become artisans or government officials because they didnt have to work on farms.
no he didnt
they didnt attack the triots because General howard taft didnt follow orders before valley forge. He got fired. This put the british threw a lot of stress so they didnt worry about the patriots.
In 1513, civilizations didnt have currency. They used the barter method of trading to pay for items they needed.
yes but they didnt want to so they moved to thorn valley
it didnt. noob.
Clothing, food, shelter.
it developed slower because it was isolated due its geographical features. they didnt have contact with the outside world and thus wasnt exposed to different cultures and their ideas/inventions/economical, political, or religious advances.
Kings were chosen for a few reasons. In a primitive society, it is easier to have a king and his descendents be leaders then to have people vote. Keep in mind that some civilizations didnt even have a form of writing and all of them didnt have a lightweight way to record a vote even if they could write. (It is not easy to Cary a thousand rocks hundreds of miles to a nations capital.) In some civilizations furthermore, Kings were believed to be chosen by God or the Gods, so people accepted their leadership. Effective civilizations generally need to have a leader that can make major decisions. Thousands of years ago, the easiest way to do this was to have a King.