Want this question answered?
It would disrupt the checks and balances of the government's branches
John Locke would likely oppose an absolute monarchy where power is centralized in a single ruler with no checks and balances. Locke believed in a government that respected individual rights and had limited powers through consent of the governed.
dfhadthj
say i love her
No, checks and balances then come into play resolving the problem.
carry away
It would disrupt the checks and balances of the government's branches.
You can kill him or make him your slave
The system of checks and balances generally works for the public good, but I wouldn't say that it always does so. Any system is only as good as the people who implement it, and human beings are notoriously imperfect creatures.
You didn't say which meaning you want to use, so here are a couple of examples. The checks were forged. When faced with a fence, the horse always checks and won't jump it. The government uses a system of checks and balances.
It would disrupt the checks and balances of the government's branches
It would disrupt the checks and balances of the government's branches