0
What did military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz list as four possible moves for a defender under attack?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
When the defender faced an assault from the enemy, Carl Von Clausewitz provided four possible alternatives for the defending army. These were:1. Deep retreat;
2. Passive defense under the cover of entrenchments;
3. Counter attack; and
4. Strategic turning movement.
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What caused Lenin to study the works of military theorist Carl von Clausewitz?
Lenin turned to the works of military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz in 1915. Lenin was not that interested in military strategy or tactics. What many people overlook is that Clausewitz paid attention to war time politics and the role of warfare in relation to the masses. In some of Lenin's writings he copied verbatim some of Clausewitz's observations on how the politics of a nation interacted with wars.
What military theorist contended that war is an extension of politics?
Credit for this idea has been given to 19th century military theorist Carl von Clausewitz. His book called On War provides examples of this.
What were the driving elements of war according to Carl Von Clausewitz?
Military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz believed that the driving elements in any war were chance, passion and rationality. These were respectively governed by the military, the people and the government.
What strategy of military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz was part of the Union's war efforts?
Military theorist had written extensively on the Napoleonic War and the military exploits of Frederick the Great. Clausewitz believed that if the enemy's army could not be destroyed, the its farms and cities should be assaulted. This would hamper the opposition's army ability to function. The Union resorted to this strategy in the second half of the war.
What was the criteria given to the value to battlefield victories by military theorist Clausewitz?
Military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz assigned different values to battlefield victories based on certain criteria. For example, a victory where the enemy was outflanked, was one factor in his value system. Also, other elements included the terrain, numerical strength of the opposing armies and how cavalry factored into the victory.
What did military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz advise to armies that were unable to win decisive battles against their enemies?
To win a decisive war, military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz believed that this is best accomplished by destroying the enemy's army. He did make mention that the capture of the enemy's capital city was important, however, that city had to be a significant military target and lose many of its defenders in the combat.
How did military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz grade the quality of a battle victory?
Military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz graded the quality of a battlefield victory on several factors. For him the value or the degree of a battlefield victory depended on whether the skill of the winning general was able to outflank the enemy. He also placed emphasis on whether the rough terrain impacted the results of the battle and what army had the superior cavalry.
How did military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz have ideas that were reflected in Confederate military operations in the Fall of 1862?
Carl Von Clausewitz relentlessly wrote about his ideas that wars were an extension of politics. The military operations of the South in the Fall of 1862 were in great part due to political pressures within the South to undermine Northern support for the war.
How did military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz define the total defeat of an enemy?
In its most basic form, Carl Von Clausewitz defined the total defeat of an enemy as military operations that were not necessarily political, although the defeat of the enemy would have political effects. But before the political ramifications were realized, Clausewitz defined total victory as the destruction of the enemy's armies and the conquest of its territory.
What did military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz believe was the best way to gain a decisive victory against an enemy?
Military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz wrote extensively about warfare, its tactics and strategies. He was aware of how difficult it was to obtain a decisive victory against an enemy based on his experience with the Prussian wars in Europe. For Clausewitz, the keys to destroying an enemy army were often built around advancing and assaulting an enemy with maximum speed to damage the enemy's main army and then to aggressively pursue the enemy's retreating forces.
What did military theorist Clausewitz was the best strategy in wars where an enemy could not be decisively beaten on the battlefield?
Military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz believed that if an enemy could not be beaten in a decisive fashion on the field of battle, there was another alternative to pursue. Clausewitz wrote that the next best strategy to defeat an enemy was to attack an enemy's important cities and agriculture areas that could supply their armies. Eventually, the Union military commanders focused on the formulas proscribed by Clausewitz. Union General William T. Sherman, with the permission of General in Chief US Grant and President Lincoln, not only fought the Army of Tennessee in the deep south, but destroyed agriculture that could feed the Rebel armies.
What is an often overlooked aspect of Carl von Clausewitz's works on warfare?
Many readers of the works of military theorist Carl von Clausewitz are often surprised at his use of metaphysics and actual religious concepts. As just one example of this, Clausewitz refers to the Trinity, the Christian trinity, when speaking about war and the people of a nation involved in one.
