that they could be improved with a match and petrol or with nijas and pirates
I think cultural criticism can do..
historical fiction
A literary critic must be well-read, even before reading the current book. They should be able to think critically about grammar, point of view and, in general, the flow of the story. Since critics write reviews about books, their writing should reflect careful thought and reasons for reaching their conclusions about the value of the book.
strong and invincible
I think most critics would agree that it is.
I think the stories are real with the love stories
I think it is probably "Inspiration".
I don't think there are true ghost stories.
Critics criticize things. When you criticize something, you point out flaws, explain what you think of it, say how it could be improved, etc. Everybody criticizes everything to some extent, but there are some professional critics who get paid to do their job. Whenever you see the reviews of a restaurant, these are written by critics. When you see the "New York Times raves- fantastic!" in movie trailers, these things were said by critics.
Well not really, but some critics think that the Doctor Who series 4 was a bit cheap compared to series 1.
Many wine critics reccommend waitrose wines. I prefer to think wine is a matter of taste, just because a critic likes a specfic wine does not mean that it would be for you. Everyones tastes are different.
I think it might be a 'vignette'. 'Literary' mean that the method of writing is more important than the contents. So a piece involving literary devices and communicative methods would be considered literary.