0
Both rich and poor Romans played Board Games with dice and counters. They would throw dice and place bets on the results. Other types of board games were checkers, they used pebbles. They also liked to play a form of jacks, using sheep knucklebones. In addition Romans enjoyed a good hunt as well as gladiator fights in coliseums. Many of them were quite bloodthirsty. Some of them played ball.
What else can I help you with?
Were colonial tailors rich or poor?
A tailor in colonial times was neither rich or poor, but lived a modest life. The tailors in that time period were needed by both the rich citizens and the poor.
Were there rich people and poor people?
they were rich but people say most on the street and sobbine all the time
What did the rich people were in the Victorians time and the poor?
The rich wore fancy gowns and suits the poor wore rags and other horrid stuff
Was rosa parks poor or rich?
She wasn't poor but she wasn't well off. She was a middle-aged, full-time working seamstress.
What was daily life like for roman women describe two differences that existed between women who were wealthy and those who were poor?
The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.
Who played chess in medieval times rich or poor?
The rich could afford chess sets. The poor mostly had little time to play, they worked too hard.
Is it better to be poor and happy?
The proverb about rich and poor indicates that those that are rich often have a difficult time letting go of their material wealth. That can hinder them from finding true riches in salvation.
Jonas Salk was poor or rich?
Jonas Salk was very rich considering the time era that he lived in. what does this question have to do with the jonas brothers?
What did the medieval rich kids do in there free time?
they had high education
How big do houses get in the old times?
it depends on what time and whose house and whether they were rich or poor.
Would you marry Waka Flocka Flame rich or poor?
Any day! Any time!
What do rich people do in their free time?
Watch tv and drink wine.
