Slave owners wanted money. They tried for things like power and control but this all tied back to more money. Occasionally they raped the slaves (used them like mistresses) but the main thing was money
To prevent the government from taking away the rights of slaveholders
They tried to prevent southerners from reading abolitionist materials. Southern slaveholders, in addition to stepping up their arguments about the value of slavery, tried to prevent southerners from reading abolitionist publications.
they anything their leader Andrew Jacskon did. and he had numerous slaves and was a slaveholder.
Slaveholders opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it sought to ban slavery in territories acquired from Mexico, threatening the balance of power between free and slave states. They believed that prohibiting slavery in these new territories would undermine their economic interests and political influence. Additionally, many slaveholders viewed the expansion of slavery as a fundamental right and integral to their way of life, seeing the Proviso as an attack on their livelihood and social order.
James Buchanan supported the Lecompton Constitution because he was a supporter of the rights of slaveholders. Buchanan served as the 15th U.S. President.
Slaveholders opposed the Wilmot Proviso because Slaveholders argued that slaves were property by the Constitution
The resource that led to Brazil being the most slaveholders in the World was sugarcane.
Former slaveholders often wanted to maintain power and control over their former slaves by seeking to pass laws that restricted their freedom and limited their opportunities. They also sought to preserve the social hierarchy and prevent freed slaves from gaining economic independence. Additionally, many former slaveholders wanted to maintain their wealth and property, often resisting any financial reparations or land redistribution proposals.
Bad
the different ways that slaveholders encouraged obedience from their slaves was to offer them more food and better living conditions.
To prevent the government from taking away the rights of slaveholders
Northerners did not want to compete for gold with slaveholders using slave labor or with free blacks.
Slaveholders claimed the Wilmot Proviso was unconstitutional because they argued that it violated the Fifth Amendment rights of slaveholders by depriving them of their property (slaves) without due process of law. They believed that Congress did not have the authority to ban slavery in the territories.
Slaveholders aimed to gather Africans of differing backgrounds and languages to prevent communication and solidarity among slaves, making it harder for them to organize and resist. By deliberately separating individuals who could potentially form alliances based on shared language or culture, slaveholders sought to maintain control and prevent uprisings.
Slaveholders wanted poor whites to feel superior to slaves, so that they would not unite with slaves to challenge the existing power structure. By convincing poor whites that they were better than slaves, slaveholders ensured that their control over slaves remained unchallenged. Additionally, slaveholders sought to maintain social order and stability by preventing potential uprisings or rebellions.
IDKK.
They was called slaveholders.