answersLogoWhite

0

Slaveholders opposed the Wilmot Proviso because Slaveholders argued that slaves were property by the Constitution

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

How did the issue of slavery in the territories acquired from Mexico disrupted American politics from 1848 to 1850?

*Northerners were antislavery people, liked the Wilmot Proviso *Southern senators block proviso *"Fire-eaters" impassioned southerners, pro-slavery *In 1848, the Democrats needed new guy, decided on General Lewis Cass, an 1812 veteran *Democrats were silent on issue of slavery, but Cass not so much *Cass loved popular sovereignty [sovereign people of territory determine slavery or not] *People like popular sovereignty because it's democratic, politicians liked because they didn't have to pick a side *Whigs nominate Zachary Taylor, the "hero of the Buena Vista," since Henry Clay had made too many enemies *Whigs weaken their platform by dodging issues, and Taylor doesn't talk of slavery but owns slaves *Anti-slavery men in the North form Free-Soil Party: publicly anti-slavery, for the Wilmot Proviso, federal aid for improvements, urged gov't homesteads for settlers, much like anti-slavery "Conscience Whigs." Slogan was "Free soil, speech, labour, and men." *Taylor wins, because the democratic vote was split by Free-Soil Van Buren *Gold is discovered in California, in which the California gov't isn't prepared for. Robbery claim jumping, and murder become common here. Meanwhile, Taylor secretly encourages to draft the Constitution of 1849 (excludes slavery), applied to Congress for admission into Union (California was to be free soil) *With 15 free states & 15 slave states, what would California be? *New Mexico & Utah were most likely to become free, which angered pro-slavery people who fought for the territories. Sources: Monty Procrastinators, November 8 Notes The American Pageant, Chapter 18


Why was Nat Turner hung twice and tortured?

Nat Turner was executed by hanging on November 11, 1831, after leading a slave rebellion in Virginia. The claim that he was hung twice is likely a misunderstanding; he was hanged once but was subjected to torture and brutal treatment before his execution as part of the efforts by slaveholders to instill fear and assert control over enslaved people. His rebellion was seen as a significant threat to the institution of slavery, prompting harsh reprisals against him and others involved.


What country did Marco Polo claim land for?

He did not claim land.


What is a claim adjustment?

An adjustment letter, formulated in response to a claim, is a document produced in response to the initial claim made. Claim being an unsatisfied customer letter or the like and the adjustment is what is made to resolve the problem


What is Tutankhamun's biggest claim to fame?

His biggest claim to Fame was the tombs and pyramids

Related Questions

Why did slaveholders claim that the Wilmette proviso was unconstitutional?

Slaveholders claimed the Wilmot Proviso was unconstitutional because they argued that it violated the Fifth Amendment rights of slaveholders by depriving them of their property (slaves) without due process of law. They believed that Congress did not have the authority to ban slavery in the territories.


How did slaveholders claim that the north benefited from slavery?

they pointed out that the north's textile industry depended on southern cotton.


How did Southerners slaveholders claim that the north benefited from slavery?

they pointed out that the north's textile industry depended on southern cotton.


Is it not unconstitutional for employers to look at your MySpace when considering you for employment?

No, it is not unconstitutional. Myspace is publicly available information that has been made available specifically by you and other users. There is no logical claim of privacy for inforamtion already publicly declared.


How Does Dr.King support his claim that the injunction is unconstitutional?

Dr. King supports his claim that the injunction is unconstitutional by arguing that it violates the First Amendment rights of individuals to assemble and express their grievances peacefully. He emphasizes that the injunction unjustly restricts the rights of demonstrators who are advocating for civil rights and social justice. By highlighting the importance of nonviolent protest in a democratic society, he asserts that such legal restrictions undermine the fundamental principles of freedom and justice.


How did the issue of slavery in the territories acquired from Mexico disrupted American politics from 1848 to 1850?

*Northerners were antislavery people, liked the Wilmot Proviso *Southern senators block proviso *"Fire-eaters" impassioned southerners, pro-slavery *In 1848, the Democrats needed new guy, decided on General Lewis Cass, an 1812 veteran *Democrats were silent on issue of slavery, but Cass not so much *Cass loved popular sovereignty [sovereign people of territory determine slavery or not] *People like popular sovereignty because it's democratic, politicians liked because they didn't have to pick a side *Whigs nominate Zachary Taylor, the "hero of the Buena Vista," since Henry Clay had made too many enemies *Whigs weaken their platform by dodging issues, and Taylor doesn't talk of slavery but owns slaves *Anti-slavery men in the North form Free-Soil Party: publicly anti-slavery, for the Wilmot Proviso, federal aid for improvements, urged gov't homesteads for settlers, much like anti-slavery "Conscience Whigs." Slogan was "Free soil, speech, labour, and men." *Taylor wins, because the democratic vote was split by Free-Soil Van Buren *Gold is discovered in California, in which the California gov't isn't prepared for. Robbery claim jumping, and murder become common here. Meanwhile, Taylor secretly encourages to draft the Constitution of 1849 (excludes slavery), applied to Congress for admission into Union (California was to be free soil) *With 15 free states & 15 slave states, what would California be? *New Mexico & Utah were most likely to become free, which angered pro-slavery people who fought for the territories. Sources: Monty Procrastinators, November 8 Notes The American Pageant, Chapter 18


What did the Kentucky and Virginia resolutions claim the states had the right to do?

The Kentucky Resolutions, authored by Jefferson, went further than Madison's Virginia Resolution and asserted that states had the power to nullify unconstitutional Federal Laws.


How does the supreme court's ability to delegate tasks compare with those of the other branches?

It corresponds with the checks and balances ie: executive branch has the president who can veto laws, and the legislative branch that can claim a law unconstitutional.


What did Kentucky and Virginia resolutions claim that states had the right to do?

The Kentucky Resolutions, authored by Jefferson, went further than Madison's Virginia Resolution and asserted that states had the power to nullify unconstitutional Federal Laws.


WHAT IS Material damage proviso in business interruption insurance?

Before a claim can be allowed, a material damage claim must be admitted. There may be circumstances when the interruption results from damage on another insurance Policy - e.g. a supplier's etc. In this case, it is imperative that the wording is sufficient to react to 'any' material damage caused by an insured peril.


Should reproductive health bill be push through?

NO! Though the proponents of the RH Bill claim that its purpose is to promote responsible parenthood, family planning, reproductive health (meaning the absence of disease or infirmity) and prevent abortion, the means they are proposing are unconstitutional and illicit. The end does not justify the means.


Why is public education unconstitutional?

Public education is often argued to be unconstitutional by some due to the interpretation of the First Amendment, which emphasizes the separation of church and state. Critics claim that public schools can inadvertently promote secular humanism or undermine parental rights regarding the education of their children. Additionally, the funding mechanisms for public education, which rely on taxation, can be viewed as a violation of individual rights. However, this perspective is not universally accepted, as many believe public education is a fundamental right and essential for a democratic society.