answersLogoWhite

0


Verified answer

That human rights had been violated, but that the conflict was not genocide

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Cookiies4U

Lvl 1
1y ago
Great answer, thanks! :)
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago

While there is a consensus in the international community that ethnic groups have been targeted in Darfur and that crimes against humanity have therefore occurred,

This answer is:
User Avatar
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why did The UN International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur concluded that the government of Sudan did not pursue a policy of genocide because?

Answer this question… the government's intention was to stop rebels, not to eliminate an ethnic group


Did the UN done anything with human rights?

Yes, they established the Human Rights Commission, of which China, Zimbabwe, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Algeria, Vietnam, Syria, Libya, and Sudan (Darfur) have been members. Effective, right?


How is Italy helping darfur?

Italy has contributed a lot of money to Sudan and Darfur, and also voted for the UN security council resolution 1769, allowing hybrid UN/African Union peacekeepers to enter sudan. The problem now is the Sudanese government is preventing these peacekeepers from entering Darfur, but they are working on it


Why did The UN International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur concluded that the government of Sudan did not pursue a policy of genocide?

Because the Sudanese government focused on rebels in general, not a specific ethnic group.


How were victims of the Sudan genocide labeled?

The UN did not recognise <the Darfur case> as genocide, although UN sent peace keepers. General public, press, writers, human right organisations remembers the Darfur case as Massacre. Many consder its as e Genocide.


How did the united nation's response to genocide in Rwanda compare to its response to mass killings in Darfur?

Although the UN took a more active role in recognizing the atrocities in Darfur, it had little impact in either case.


How did The United Nations response to genocide Rwanda compare to its response to mass killings in in Darfur?

Although the UN took a more active role in recognizing the atrocities in Darfur, it had little impact in either case.


How did the United Nations' response to genocide in Rwanda compare its response to mass killings in Darfur?

Although the UN took a more active role in recognizing the atrocities in Darfur, it had little impact in either case.


Who is chairman of UN human rights commission?

Dr.Br.Ambedkar


What is the approximate popular of Darfur?

Prior to 2004 the population of Darfur was 6 million people but 2008 the UN reported an estimate 4.7 million people. Over 400 villages were destroyed causing many people to flee.


Compare and contrast the genocide in Rwanda and Darfur?

rwanada had the UN involved more people died and lasted 100 days


Who is The chief of UN Special Commission on Iraq?

Richard butler