US v. Armstrong, 517 US 456 (1996)
U.S. v. Armstrong (1996) was a case in which the petitioner was (surprisingly) the United States, and the respondent, Christopher Lee Armstrong. The claim in this case, was that the government should not be required to provide pre-trial disclosure of documents relevant to a case in cases of reported selective prosecution unless the respondent provides a reasonable and valid basis for believing that other people in analogous situations have not been prosecuted.
Here, the Court upheld the government's claim that African Americans prosecuted for drug offenses could not provide enough evidence to obtain pre-trial disclosure of documents relevant to the case (discovery) supporting their claim of selective prosecution. They failed to show that the government selected not to prosecute those in like situations.
The only dissenting judge was Judge John Paul Stevens. Chief Justice Rehnquist delivered the opinion of the Court.
(Supreme Court)
The US Supreme Court disposed of 145 cases in 1978, hearing arguments in 141 of them.
The Supreme Court created an exception to the exclusionary rule for searches conducted by school administrators.
Decisions of the US Supreme Court affect the rulings and procedures of EVERY other court in the country, right down to the municipal level.
According to the Supreme Court Rules, Rule 10, the most important source is the US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts.
1961The US Supreme Court extended the exclusionary rule to the state as a result of their decision in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961). The rule was originally created and applied to the federal government in Weeks v. US, (1914).
so the few can over rule the majority .
No
The US Supreme Court is the highest court in the US. Each state has its own Supreme Court, but the US Supreme Court is the end of the line.
How long do supreme court justices severe for
At what point in history? The US Supreme Court has changed its stance on labor laws and workplace protection a number of times.
The US Supreme Court determines whether to hear a case according to the Rule of Four. If at least four of the nine Justices of the Supreme Court agree, they will grant certiorari and hear the case.