Want this question answered?
If any evidence is acquired without a proper warrant for search and seizure, the evidence must be thrown out before court and the jury cannot use the evidence against the accused in a court case.
The 1987 Supreme Court case that supported the use of evidence obtained with a search warrant that was inaccurate in its specifics is Massachusetts v. Sheppard. In this case, the court ruled that as long as the police officers acted in good faith reliance on the warrant, the evidence could still be used against the defendant.
Evidence of a crime can be used regardless of where it is recovered from.
Yes. That is the point.
Some evidence is inadmissible in a court of law.
"The evidence for evolution countervails over the arguments against it." THis means that evidence for evolution counteracts the arguments against it.
what doctrine does he court use in deciding cases invovling laws against sedition
Discovery is an important phase in both civil and criminal court cases. This is the process by which the defense gets access to the evidence being presented against the defendant so that the defense can address the information in court.
It is generally not advisable to use information obtained through a private investigation without legal guidance. In New York, the admissibility of such evidence may be subject to specific rules and requirements in family court. It's important to consult with a family law attorney to understand the best approach and any potential implications before using this information in a custody battle.
papoi
If you have clear evidence in this regard, you can file a complaint with the State Supreme Court. This is why it's important to use Court Watchers.
A written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation, for use as evidence in court is an affidavit.