answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Enlightenment thinkers viewed the social contract as an implicit agreement among individuals to establish a society and government to ensure mutual protection and benefit. They believed that individuals willingly give up some of their natural rights in exchange for the protection of their remaining rights within a civil society.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

2d ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What did the enlightenment thinkers view as social contract?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Philosophy

What distinguished Thomas Hobbes from other enlightenment thinkers?

Thomas Hobbes stood out from other Enlightenment thinkers due to his pessimistic view of human nature, advocating for strong central authority to prevent chaos and ensure social order. Unlike his contemporaries who believed in the innate goodness of humans, Hobbes argued that people were inherently self-serving and driven by fear and desire. His work laid the foundation for modern political theory and social contract philosophy.


Did the philosophers of the enlightenment have an optimistic view of human nature?

Many philosophers of the Enlightenment, such as Rousseau and Locke, had a relatively optimistic view of human nature. They believed that individuals were born inherently good and rational, and that progress and improvement were achievable through reason and education. However, views on human nature varied among different Enlightenment thinkers.


Where does authority rest in Rousseau's view of the social contract?

In Rousseau's view of the social contract, authority rests with the general will, which represents the collective interests of the people as a whole. This general will is formed through the agreement and participation of all members of society, giving legitimacy to the authority it imposes. This contrasts with a government based on individual or elite rule.


How did the philosophers of the Enlightenment view the relationship between government and the governed?

Philosophers of the Enlightenment, such as John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, believed in the social contract theory, asserting that power and authority of government should be based on the consent of the governed. They argued that governments should protect individual rights and that the governed have the right to overthrow oppressive governments. Essentially, they emphasized the importance of a mutual and just relationship between the government and the governed.


How did enlightenment thinker view the universe?

Enlightenment thinkers viewed the universe as governed by natural laws that could be understood through reason and observation. They believed in a rational order to the universe and emphasized the importance of scientific inquiry and intellectual freedom to uncover truths about the natural world. Many of them rejected the idea of a supernatural or divine explanation for the workings of the universe.

Related questions

What were the enlightenment thinkers view on religion?

Enlightenment thinkers had diverse views on religion. Some, like Voltaire, criticized organized religion and advocated for religious tolerance. Others, like Thomas Paine, promoted reason and skepticism towards traditional religious beliefs. Overall, Enlightenment thinkers emphasized the importance of individual autonomy and freedom of thought in matters of religion.


How did the ideas of the enlightenment influence the french people in the years leading up the french revolution?

Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Social Contract persuaded them to view practices like inherited privilege and absolute monarchy as irrational.


How did the idea of the Enlightenment influence the French people in the years leading up to the French Revolution?

Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Social Contract persuaded them to view practices like inherited privilege and absolute monarchy as irrational.


What was Thomas Hobbes view of a social contract?

Thomas Hobbes believed that a social contract was necessary to maintain order and prevent a state of nature where life would be solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. He argued that individuals should surrender some of their freedoms in exchange for protection and a stable society governed by a sovereign authority.


How did renaissance thinkers view Aristotle?

Renaissance thinkers held Aristotle in high regard, considering him a foundational figure in philosophy and science. They sought to reconcile his teachings with Christian theology, leading to the development of Scholasticism. Aristotle's works were translated into Latin during this period and became central to shaping intellectual thought.


What is the government of contract?

The social contract theory is the view that a persons moral and or political obligations are dependent upon a contract or agreement among them to form the society in which they live. Socrates used something like this theory in his work.


How did this differ from the view of many liberal thinkers?

Many liberal thinkers emphasize individual rights and freedoms, often prioritizing personal liberty and equality. They tend to advocate for a more active government role in addressing social inequalities and ensuring the well-being of all citizens. In contrast, this perspective may focus more on individual responsibility and limited government intervention in economic and social affairs.


Did the philosophers of the enlightenment have an optimistic view of human nature?

Many philosophers of the Enlightenment, such as Rousseau and Locke, had a relatively optimistic view of human nature. They believed that individuals were born inherently good and rational, and that progress and improvement were achievable through reason and education. However, views on human nature varied among different Enlightenment thinkers.


How did the enlightenment change the way people viewed the government?

Enlightenment gave people a different view of how government works. People began to view government as a means to accomplish bigger goals.


Why is social contract theory criticized?

Social contract usually assumes the existence of natural law which in turn defines some rights of individuals, and that individuals can trade off some of these rights under "social contract" for the protection that government can provide.Some philosophers say that there are no natural laws, and that what are assumed to be natural laws are no more than what is commonly agreed to be just laws. Without natural laws, there are no natural rights and there is therefore nothing for the individual to trade over to the government. On this view, the social contract theory can not be supported.It is also said that the social contract theory establishes the authority of government except when it is really needed. If the right of a government is established because I agreed, or entered into a social contract, to hand over my right to act as I please, then all I need do is cancel that contract before carrying out any crime I choose.


How did the enlightenment affect people's view of science?

To the extent that science existed during the age of enlightenment it was accepted more than in earlier periods.


What is America's first social contract?

That depends on your view of the social contract. Some philosophers, like David Hume, might say there was no time when EVERYBODY consented to a government so there were none! In a more practical sense, the first social contract would probably be the mayflower compact in the 1640s. this was pretty close to a legitimate contract because every one who wanted to be protected by it had to sign it. (at least every white christian male). If you mean the first governments assembled by Americans in America, then the first American social contracts might also be attributed to the first state constitutions. the first of which was implemented in 1775.