0
Court ruled that Georgia was not entitled to regulate the Cherokee nor to invade their lands.
Alexandrine Nienow
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What did the Supreme Court rule in the case Worcester v. Georgia?
Court ruled that Georgia was not entitled to regulate the Cherokee nor to invade their lands.
How did Jackson respond to the ruling in Worcester v Georgia?
Jackson's comments on the case are known from a letter to John Coffee: "...the decision of the Supreme Court has fell still born, and they find that they cannot coerce Georgia to yield to its mandate," indicating that the Supreme Court could rule however they wanted to, but that they couldn't force anyone to obey them.
Did the Supreme Court of Georgia rule on the constitutionality of Georgia's ban on same-sex marriage?
Yes, the Supreme Court of Georgia has ruled on the constitutionality of Georgia's ban on same-sex marriage. The ban was not overturned.
How did president Jackson respond to the ruling in Worcester's v Georgia?
Jackson's comments on the case are known from a letter to John Coffee: "...the decision of the Supreme Court has fell still born, and they find that they cannot coerce Georgia to yield to its mandate," indicating that the Supreme Court could rule however they wanted to, but that they couldn't force anyone to obey them.
What did the supreme court rule in furman v. Georgia?
In Furman vs. Georgia the court ruled that all existing death penalty laws violated the constitution.
What did the US Supreme Court rule in Furman v Georgia?
In Furman vs. Georgia the court ruled that all existing death penalty laws violated the constitution.
Who can rule that federal laws are unconstitutional?
(Supreme Court)
How did chief john Marshall rule in worcester v. Georgia?
In Worcester v. Georgia, (1832), the US Supreme Court decided the states (in this case, Georgia) had no right to redraw the boundaries of Native American territories, or to require white people to purchase a license to live on the land. As a result, the lower court decision convicting eleven missionaries of violating state law by refusing to purchase a permit to live on Cherokee land was reversed.The seven-member Supreme Court, lead by Chief Justice John Marshall, voted 6-1 on March 3, 1832, to overturn the missionaries' convictions.Case Citation:Worcester v. Georgia, 31 US 515 (1832)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
How did Chief Justice Marshall rule in Worcester v. Georgia?
In Worcester v. Georgia, (1832), the US Supreme Court decided the states (in this case, Georgia) had no right to redraw the boundaries of Native American territories, or to require white people to purchase a license to live on the land. As a result, the lower court decision convicting eleven missionaries of violating state law by refusing to purchase a permit to live on Cherokee land was reversed.The seven-member Supreme Court, lead by Chief Justice John Marshall, voted 6-1 on March 3, 1832, to overturn the missionaries' convictions.Case Citation:Worcester v. Georgia, 31 US 515 (1832)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Can the state Supreme Court over rule the federal Supreme Court?
No
What supreme court diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?
Supreme Court cases diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?
What supreme court case diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?
Supreme Court cases diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?
