Many religious scholars would freely state that both the Jewish Tanakh and the Christian Holy Bible are the inspired word of God recorded over approximately 2000 years by various writers. Many of these same scholars fail to accept the teachings from the Muslim Koran and Haddith, written well after the completion of both other books (circa 7th Century AD) as the same, though Muslims would fully disagree.
Then there are those scholars who would point out that each of these 3 religious books point to 'One God,' and how each is descendent (physically and/or spiritually) from Abraham. Also, many Jews and Muslims recognize the historical Jesus as a 'Prophet' from God. Jews do not recognize Him as the Messiah (still to come) and Muslims see Mohammed as the last and greater Prophet.
One thing they have in common is that the city people feared the founders of each religion because of their great power.
It is called the "common" era by some people because it is commonly shared among all cultures of the world as the predominant year-numbering system, despite its Western/Eurocentric bias. For example, it is the year 1432 in the Islamic era, 5771 in the Hebrew era, 2555 in the Buddhist era, and 2011 in the Christian era. But the Christian era is the one that has come to be used all around the world, even in Islamic, Buddhist and Jewish circles, for civil convenience purposes. Therefore, in addition to being the Christian era, it is considered the "Common" era.
The surname "David" is of Hebrew origin, meaning "beloved." It is derived from the biblical figure King David, who is a central character in Jewish, Christian, and Islamic traditions. The name is common in various cultures and may appear in different forms, such as "Davids" or "Davis," and often signifies a connection to heritage or religious significance.
No, it is usally not in the same order. Most Jewish editions of the Hebrew Bible are written in either Common Order or Lenningrad Codex order. Christian translations of the text (called "The Old Testament"), are usually organized by subject matter, rather than authorship.
Daniel is a Hebrew name. It could come from Israel, since people like to take names from the Bible, it could come from any other nation where the Hebrew or Christian Holy books have been in common use for centuries. See the Related Link.
The books of the Old Testament. Catholic Bibles include passages, and even whole books, added by later Greek authors, which were purged from Jewish Bibles. Protestants followed the Jewish example, and purged the same material.
There is no such thing as "the English Bible." The There is only a Hebrew Bible, which can be translated into any language, including English. The order of the Books of the Hebrew bible has nothing to do with what language it's translated into. It has more to do with whether it's a Christian Translation or a Jewish Translation. Jewish Translations preserve the original order of the Hebrew Bible. Christian translations usually use a different order, created by the early Church around the 2nd Century of the common era.
If it is an Islamic name, it's not a terribly common one. More than likely, it is not an Islamic name.
Yes they did. The most common translation used by the pilgrims was the Geneva Bible.
No. Hannah is a Hebrew name. Technically Hebrew is not a religion, and is merely a language. It would be a Jewish name, deriving from the name Chana. (I'm Jewish, and called Hannah so I should know)
Because the Christian and Islamic religions teach that leadership belongs to males.
Some books are included in bibles used by some churches, not included in others. The ones excluded from all common bibles are called the Apocrypha, and are available separately in religious bookstores.