plants
Evolutionists believe that scientific evidence supports the Theory of Evolution. Creationists believe the Theory of Evolution contradicts the Biblical story of creation and, therefore, fight against its acceptance. Scientists, even those who accept the existence of God and the validity of the Bible, believe that a scientific theory must be supported by evidence. It's not a case of anyone debunking anyone. Scientists and Creationists alike start off with personal beliefs: scientists in science and creationists in the Biblical account of creation. Neither is without bias and both attempt to find evidence that supports their core beliefs.
Generally speaking, the answer is no. Most Evolutionists do not have a strongly religious view of the origin of the Earth, while Creationists (by definition) believe that the formation of the Earth was a purposeful act by God. These links may be helpful:http://www.allaboutscience.org/intelligent-design.htmhttp://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/sci-ev/sci_vs_ev_26.htmhttp://judaism.answers.com/jewish-philosophy/can-you-prove-that-god-existsWhat_are_some_proofs_offered_by_Creationists
Evolution is generally accepted in the scientists. The only controversy comes from certain groups who believe that the theory undermines their previously held faiths and who think it should not be taught in schools.Answer:Actually evolution is not debated.It is the best representation available of the processes that lead to the development of the life forms existing on Earth today.As a comparison: To have an equivalent situation of evolutionists "debating" creationists you would have to picture scientists meeting with monster movie fans to "debate" if Tyrannosaurus Rex could defeat Godzilla - and both sides thinking the outcome would mean anything.
kuamini or kuamania are the infinitive forms (both on loan from Arabic roots).
The plural form of asparagus is "asparagus." It remains the same in both singular and plural forms.
Yes- they are forms of the same word. Pretentious is the adjective version of the noun pretention-- both are forms of the verb, pretend which means to act as if something is true even if it is not -- to play make believe.
Everyone must admit that there are striking similarities between men and certain animals! For most people, the leading attraction at the zoo is the monkey house, because monkeys resemble humans more than any other animals do, and it is amusing to watch them! If you were to look at the skeleton of an ape and the skeleton of a person, you would discover many similarities! How can we explain these remarkable similarities?Evolutionists believe that similarity points to a common ancestry. Animals resemble each other because they are related to each other, and thus they believe that RESEMBLANCE indicates RELATIONSHIP. They would say that man looks like a monkey because he is KIN to a monkey (related to a monkey through a common apelike ancestor). Man does not look too much like an elephant, but he looks more like an elephant than he does a jellyfish, so this means that man is more closely related to the elephant than he is to the jellyfish (he is a close cousin to the elephant, but he is a distant relative to the jellyfish!). Evolutionists believe that man is related to all plant and animal life because they say that all life began from that first living cell which they think evolved in the primitive ocean millions of years ago. Thus, evolutionists even believe that we are related to the moss we walk upon, to the mosquitoes which bite us, to the worms we fish with and to the fish we catch with the worms! They believe that all living things can trace their ancestry back to that first living cell.Below is a diagram of an evolutionary family tree. "The base of the trunk represents unknown, primitive forms of life from which all plants and animals arose" (Zoology, A Golden Science Guide, p. 6). This family tree shows how the evolutionists believe that all plants and animals are related to each other
Not much. While they both accept that life is here, they are two totally different ideas on how we got here. Evolution says that all life forms gradually developed from a common ancestor over millions of years. Creation says that everything was spontaneously created as they are by the God of the Bible within six days only a few thousand years ago.
Confiers have both male and female forms.
There is good amount of evidence to believe that all the life forms have ego. You can not have a life form without the feeling of ego. This ego gives you desire to preserve your self. This ego gives you desire to reproduce. These both factors forms basis of every life form. There is no evidence to believe that this ego is more or less in any species of animal, plant or microorganism. Probably same is true with the viruses also. There is no evidence to believe that this ego is more or less in any individual life form.
it is both i believe if my teacher is correct then it is BOTH! =]] hope i helped! it is both i believe if my teacher is correct then it is BOTH! =]] hope i helped!
Whether some forms of cancer have genetic causes ;-;