plants
Evolutionists believe that scientific evidence supports the Theory of Evolution. Creationists believe the Theory of Evolution contradicts the Biblical story of creation and, therefore, fight against its acceptance. Scientists, even those who accept the existence of God and the validity of the Bible, believe that a scientific theory must be supported by evidence. It's not a case of anyone debunking anyone. Scientists and Creationists alike start off with personal beliefs: scientists in science and creationists in the Biblical account of creation. Neither is without bias and both attempt to find evidence that supports their core beliefs.
Generally speaking, the answer is no. Most Evolutionists do not have a strongly religious view of the origin of the Earth, while Creationists (by definition) believe that the formation of the Earth was a purposeful act by God. These links may be helpful:http://www.allaboutscience.org/intelligent-design.htmhttp://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/sci-ev/sci_vs_ev_26.htmhttp://judaism.answers.com/jewish-philosophy/can-you-prove-that-god-existsWhat_are_some_proofs_offered_by_Creationists
Evolution is generally accepted in the scientists. The only controversy comes from certain groups who believe that the theory undermines their previously held faiths and who think it should not be taught in schools.Answer:Actually evolution is not debated.It is the best representation available of the processes that lead to the development of the life forms existing on Earth today.As a comparison: To have an equivalent situation of evolutionists "debating" creationists you would have to picture scientists meeting with monster movie fans to "debate" if Tyrannosaurus Rex could defeat Godzilla - and both sides thinking the outcome would mean anything.
kuamini or kuamania are the infinitive forms (both on loan from Arabic roots).
The plural form of asparagus is "asparagus." It remains the same in both singular and plural forms.
Yes- they are forms of the same word. Pretentious is the adjective version of the noun pretention-- both are forms of the verb, pretend which means to act as if something is true even if it is not -- to play make believe.
Two similarities between a fish and a monkey are that they are both vertebrates, meaning they have a backbone, and they both have bilateral symmetry, meaning their bodies can be divided into two mirror-image halves. Additionally, both fish and monkeys have sensory organs such as eyes and ears to help them navigate their environments and communicate with others of their species.
Confiers have both male and female forms.
Not much. While they both accept that life is here, they are two totally different ideas on how we got here. Evolution says that all life forms gradually developed from a common ancestor over millions of years. Creation says that everything was spontaneously created as they are by the God of the Bible within six days only a few thousand years ago.
it is both i believe if my teacher is correct then it is BOTH! =]] hope i helped! it is both i believe if my teacher is correct then it is BOTH! =]] hope i helped!
There is good amount of evidence to believe that all the life forms have ego. You can not have a life form without the feeling of ego. This ego gives you desire to preserve your self. This ego gives you desire to reproduce. These both factors forms basis of every life form. There is no evidence to believe that this ego is more or less in any species of animal, plant or microorganism. Probably same is true with the viruses also. There is no evidence to believe that this ego is more or less in any individual life form.
Both are valid forms in English.