0
Not much. While they both accept that life is here, they are two totally different ideas on how we got here. Evolution says that all life forms gradually developed from a common ancestor over millions of years. Creation says that everything was spontaneously created as they are by the God of The Bible within six days only a few thousand years ago.
What else can I help you with?
What interpretations of Ayers Rock are given by evolutionary scientists?
Ayer's Rock/Uluru is a sandstone formation in the centre of a desert. Rocks are the area of geologists, not biologists. Evolutionary scientists wouldn't care either way about it (unless it happened to contain some new fossils or biological research material).
Do any scientists today who are not creationists express dissent from Darwin and his views?
Such a person would have to meet three requirements: 1) Publishes articles in peer reviewed scientific journals. 2) Religious or not, he/she doesn't concern him/herself with creationism. 3) Objects to evolution. I know of people who publish scientific articles and aren't religious/creationists - but they don't object to evolution. I know of people who publish scientific articles and object to evolution (though not simultaneously) - but they are creationists. I know of people who object to evolution but are not creationists - however they don't publish. I know of no people who meet all three criteria.
What do anti-evolutionists creationists and intelligent design advocates really know of evolution?
From there pamphlets and " text " books it would seem very little is known by these people. The basics, such as evolution is a fact and the theory of evolution by natural selection explains much of this fact, seems to elude many of them. Look to the intelligent design people. Not one scintilla of positive evidence can they cite, yet they want their nonsense, not scientifically validated, to be taught in science class. A cheat and a end run around the scientific process.
What is Young Earth theory?
The Young Earth theory is not so much a theory, in the scientific sense, as a hypothesis. It is held by some creationists who believe that if they interpret The Bible literally then the earth must be only a few thousand years old, usually believed to have been created by God around 4000 BCE.In contrast, other creationists hold to an Old Earth hypothesis, because they accept that the scientific age of the earth is irrefutable. They see room to interpret the Bible in a way that allows for both divine creation and an immense age for the Earth.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
What theme about the pursuit of science would Mary Shelly most likely agree?
Mary Shelley would likely agree that the pursuit of science carries both the potential for great progress and significant moral responsibility. In "Frankenstein," she illustrates how unchecked ambition and the quest for knowledge can lead to unintended consequences and suffering. Shelley emphasizes the importance of considering ethical implications and the human condition in scientific endeavors, warning against the dangers of hubris. Ultimately, she advocates for a balanced approach to science that respects both its power and its limitations.
What do both creationists and evolutionists believe coal forms from?
plants
Did sharks once lived on land?
No. Neither by evolutionists or creationists.
When creationist and evolutionist are in agreement on all of the following items except?
Creationists and evolutionists generally agree on the following points: that life exists on Earth, that species can adapt to their environments, and that changes in the environment can impact life forms. However, they diverge significantly on the origins of life and the mechanisms behind the diversity of species, with creationists typically attributing origins to a divine creator and evolutionists supporting natural processes such as natural selection and genetic mutation.
Which famous 1925 trial pitted creationists against evolutionists?
The famous 1925 trial that pitted creationists against evolutionists was the Scopes "Monkey" Trial, officially known as the State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes. John Scopes, a high school science teacher, was accused of violating Tennessee's Butler Act by teaching evolution in a public school.
Do evolutionists and creationists agree on the origin of the earth?
Generally speaking, the answer is no. Most Evolutionists do not have a strongly religious view of the origin of the Earth, while Creationists (by definition) believe that the formation of the Earth was a purposeful act by God. These links may be helpful:http://www.allaboutscience.org/intelligent-design.htmhttp://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/sci-ev/sci_vs_ev_26.htmhttp://judaism.answers.com/jewish-philosophy/can-you-prove-that-god-existsWhat_are_some_proofs_offered_by_Creationists
Is it okay to call creationists weird?
Some people say it is okay(especially evolutionists). But I don't think it is okay to call anyone weird. That is just plain mean.
Is the Evolutionists' sole purpose is to debunk the Creationists or is it the other way around?
Evolutionists believe that scientific evidence supports the Theory of Evolution. Creationists believe the Theory of Evolution contradicts the Biblical story of creation and, therefore, fight against its acceptance. Scientists, even those who accept the existence of God and the validity of the Bible, believe that a scientific theory must be supported by evidence. It's not a case of anyone debunking anyone. Scientists and Creationists alike start off with personal beliefs: scientists in science and creationists in the Biblical account of creation. Neither is without bias and both attempt to find evidence that supports their core beliefs.
What do evolutionists believe about the origin of uluru compared to creationists?
Evolutionists generally believe that Uluru, also known as Ayers Rock, was formed through geological processes over millions of years, shaped by erosion and weathering. In contrast, creationists often interpret Uluru's origin through a biblical lens, suggesting it was created by divine action during a relatively short timeframe, consistent with their beliefs about the Earth's age. This fundamental difference highlights the contrasting views on natural processes versus supernatural creation.
What people rejected the research approach of evolutionists who studied culture from a historical perspective?
Creationists and proponents of intelligent design are groups of people who have rejected the research approach of evolutionists studying culture from a historical perspective. They often argue that the findings and interpretations of evolutionary cultural studies contradict their beliefs in divine creation or intelligent design.
Were mammoths around at the same time as possums?
No. There is a gap of roughly 60 million years between the existence of the last dinosaurs to the first mammoth remains found.
When was The Creationists created?
The Creationists was created in 1993.
How many pages does The Creationists have?
The Creationists has 624 pages.
