stop in the name of law
1--------------It Can Be Used By Police To Find Criminals........ 2--------------- Criminals computer has all information the police wants.....
No. The police officer has a duty to protect the public from the criminals. Criminals are also part of the public, and the police do not have to help the criminals make good decisions. Police interrogators are not required to assist criminal suspects, but instead are permitted to trick them into confessing.
Surveillance can help identify leading criminals, therefore allowing the police to detain them. This is also offputting to other would-be criminals.
ummm...catching criminals maybe?
The most problems is criminals
Chicago
standard operating procedure.
they would put peanut butter on a rope and wait for criminals to come
criminals, crimes, speeding,disorderly conduct,violance
In the 1880s, police caught criminals through a combination of detective work, informants, eyewitnesses, and physical evidence. They relied on developing clues and following up leads to track down suspects and gather evidence for prosecution. Police also used wanted posters, rewards, and community cooperation to apprehend criminals.
At home they can have any pets, but on the force many police forces use dogs to catch criminals
It is just that more African-Americans are accused of crimes in the areas where the police think that.