it is better at their work
If their data supported their hypothesis, then they would make a conclusion.
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
make a new hypothesis. if not the scientist continues believing in their hypothesis without any proof and becomes a mad scientist
Scientists then state another hypothesis and test it out with another experiment.
several times, and must get agreement from the scientific community
After forming a hypothesis, the scientist will design and conduct experiments to test the hypothesis. They will collect data, analyze the results, and draw conclusions based on the findings. If the hypothesis is supported by the data, it may lead to the development of a theory.
supported by enough data to become a theory.
If a hypothesis is not supported, a scientist should first carefully analyze the data to identify any potential errors or anomalies in the experiment. This may involve reviewing the methodology, checking for biases, or considering alternative explanations. Next, the scientist might revise the hypothesis based on the findings and conduct further experiments to test the new or modified hypothesis. It's also essential to communicate the results and their implications to the scientific community for feedback and further investigation.
Apex: conclusion
You can perform the experiment again to check for errors. The best option is to just state in the conclusion the sources of error and why the experiment didn't support the hypothesis. Remember the hypothesis is only an educated guess.
Scientist consider hypothesis to be an educated guess on what they are studying. If that scientist researches and experiments more, he will see if his hypothesis is true or false.