If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
it is better at their work
If their data supported their hypothesis, then they would make a conclusion.
make a new hypothesis. if not the scientist continues believing in their hypothesis without any proof and becomes a mad scientist
Scientists then state another hypothesis and test it out with another experiment.
If a hypothesis is not supported, a scientist should first analyze the data to identify any patterns or inconsistencies that may explain the outcome. They should then consider revising the hypothesis based on these insights or exploring alternative explanations. It may also be beneficial to review the experimental design and methodology to ensure that the results are valid and reliable. Finally, conducting further experiments or gathering additional data can help clarify the situation.
several times, and must get agreement from the scientific community
If a hypothesis is not supported, a scientist should first carefully analyze the data to identify any potential errors or anomalies in the experiment. This may involve reviewing the methodology, checking for biases, or considering alternative explanations. Next, the scientist might revise the hypothesis based on the findings and conduct further experiments to test the new or modified hypothesis. It's also essential to communicate the results and their implications to the scientific community for feedback and further investigation.
After forming a hypothesis, the scientist will design and conduct experiments to test the hypothesis. They will collect data, analyze the results, and draw conclusions based on the findings. If the hypothesis is supported by the data, it may lead to the development of a theory.
you should go to the next ster
supported by enough data to become a theory.
To determine whether Fleming's hypothesis should be supported or rejected based on an experiment, one would need to analyze the results of the experiment in relation to the hypothesis. If the data from the experiment aligns with the predictions made by Fleming's hypothesis, then it should be supported. However, if the results contradict the hypothesis, it may need to be rejected or revised.