Want this question answered?
A con of the death penalty is that it costs the taxpayers a lot of money. The death penalty also comes with moral concerns.
I do not think that the death penalty is much of a deterrent, but is a fact that murderers who are put to death will kill no one else, and will not have his miserable life supported at taxpayers' expense.
No it is not fair for people to acually go against what they believe in to support it! the whole idea for tax, i think, is to help people or idems to and for a good cause
The advantages of the death penalty are that it stops criminals for reofending and the tax payer doesn't have to pay for imprisonment. It could also stop other criminals from offending because if you get caught there is the prospect of death.
how much money do taxpayers pay in expenses created by crashes
Actually no. I am part Lakota and though we don't pay taxes with the IRS and all that we do go to jail and get the death penalty
The citizens of the individual states vote for or against capital punishment. Death penalty or life without parole, both are payed for by taxpayers.
The dead cannot re-offend. Taxpayers do not need to feed, clothe, and provide medical care for a dead man that would otherwise be incarcerated for the rest of their live.
For. If most of the citizens in Texas did not want the death penalty, there would be no death penalty.
Depends on what you did. I honestly think that if you raped or killed someone, the death penalty wouldn't be too harsh. i agree with this how would you like it if someone killed your brother or something you would want pay back i kno i would
Now, no death penalty in Romania.
No,the state of Nebraska does not have the death penalty.