Welcome to the world of real-life experiments.
Back to basics and examine your hypothesis, your assumptions, and your experimental apparatus and controls.
No, because it is a statement with a history, if it is wrong it is superseded by a new hypothesis.
Well, the scientific process starts with an observation or an idea, then a hypothesis "To guess what happens when its putted to the test" which is the next step, and finally if the hypothesis is correct it changes the original theory, if wrong you have to start over :)
Make an Experimentation OR Perform an Experimentation .
think of alternative explanations for their results
Matching hypothesis was created in 1966.
Go back and check for flaws, and if you can't find any, form a new hypothesis.
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
Rejecting a hypothesis shows you that it was wrong and it shows you what not to do. It can help lead you to a better, more accurate hypothesis the next time.
there is never really a wrong hypothesis because its basically just a guess....
It is when you know that your hypothesis is wrong.
You can modify it(if u think it your hypothesis is wrong). However,a hypothesis is actually a guess of the result.Thus, it has no right or wrong in your hypothesis.
the Hypothesis would probably be also wrong but its okay because a hypothesis is a educated guess
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community.* Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
Proving a hypothesis wrong is more helpful because then you know what is incorrect for next time or someone else.
Her hypothesis was wrong, and the teacher marked her entire assignment wrong because of it.
that depends on exactly what the hypothesis is. You cannot determine if something is right or wrong by who made the hypothesis.
Yes Because.!!(: