0
What do you think of OBriens strategy for conducting a war with you having to put your own precious fluids on the line on the rainy river?
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What do you think of O'Brien's strategy for conducting a war with you having to put your own precious fluids on the line?
what do you think of o'brien strategy for conducting a war with "you having to put your own precious fluids on the line
What do you think of O’Brien’s strategy for conducting a war with “you having to put your own precious fluids on the line”?
I think O'Brien's strategy for conducting a war with "you having to put your own precious fluids on the line" is a risky one but one that could be effective if executed properly. It is a strategy based on the idea that if a soldier is willing to put their own blood, sweat, and tears into a battle, it will help to motivate them to fight harder and with more determination. The idea is that by having soldiers make a personal investment in the fight, they will be more likely to give their all and give it their all in a fight. At the same time, this strategy can be incredibly dangerous. It puts a soldier's well-being at risk, which can be a huge detriment to morale and effectiveness. Additionally, it can be difficult to measure just how much of an effect this strategy has on the battlefield. It can be difficult to measure just how much of an effect this strategy has on a soldier's motivation, and it can be even more difficult to measure its overall effect on the battlefield. Ultimately, I believe that O'Brien's strategy of having soldiers put their own fluids on the line is a risky one, but one that could be effective if done properly. It requires a delicate balance between motivating and protecting soldiers, as well as being able to measure its effectiveness in battle. If this balance can be achieved, it could be a powerful tool for any military.
In which situation will the M50 mask provide protection?
The M50 is an NBC mask. NBC stands for Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical. It is important to note in each of these events that the mask will only protect you from breathing the components and irritating your eyes. A full NBC suit is required to keep chemical, biological and radioactive particles from affecting your skin. To answer your question in another format, the M50 (or any other like rated NBC) mask will do the following: -filter out airborne dust/debris -drastically reduce toxins and harmful particles (mustard, tear gas, mace, smoke, etc...) -provide a barrier from radiation and dirty frag particles (in the event of nuclear attack) -eliminate possibility of biological disease transmission (flu, AIDS/HIV, and other diseases transmitted though bodily fluids and breathing) Again, most NBC rated masks will do this. The main benefit to the M50 is that it was specifically designed to fit close to the face and reduce breathing effort. The close fitting face piece allows a wide range of vision, and when combined with the huge visor, the M50 becomes a very effective mask to use in combat situations. Additionally the two filters and voice box allow the user to breathe more normally and to communicate through the mask without the help of electronics. The only downside to the mask that i have been able to surmise is its filters. In a disaster scenario, the filters are difficult to locate because they are so specialized. therefore you couldn't use the standard NATO filter canister off of a dead person if yours was becoming too contaminated. But the original reason for the specialized filters is to cut down on weight and improve visual area. Bottom line, this is one of the best masks you can buy unless you are investing in an SCBA (self contained breathing apparatus). An SCBA is like a SCUBA set, just without the water (its $100 M50 versus a $3,000 SCBA). your best bet is the M50. Plus it just looks so f-ing cool! :) Additionally check this out: http://www.avon-rubber.com/m53-nbc-mask-enters-service-with-us-special-operations-units.htm
What happened in the beginning of World War 2?
I believe you mean: What happens during World War 2 in the Philippines? If that is what you mean then here is a simple outline. The US owned the Philippines at the time (1941). Japan invaded the Philippines soon after they bombed Pearl Harbor Hawaii. The Army forces fought the Japanese and were driven back to the Bataan Peninsula. They continued to fight until they were basically starving and did not have enough ammo to fend off the Japanese. Their military General MacArthur had left the Philippines at the beginning when President Roosevelt ordered him to leave the islands and head to Australia. The US Army forces were taken as prisoners by the Japanese when they were forced to surrender. Filipinos who fought with the American were also taken as prisoners. The POWs had to march a long way to a camp called Camp O'Donnell. On this march thousands of men (both American and Filipino) died along the way because the Japanese would not give them any fluids or food. They killed off anyone who could not keep marching. Some of the POWs were taken to Japan and other places. Many died in the ships as they traveled to Japan. Some were killed when the Allied Forces bombed the ships the POWs were in (unknowingly of course). The Filipino citizens spent three plus years in agony being ruled by the Japanese Soldiers. They were frequently starved, beaten, killed and even had babies killed to be forced to do what the Japanese Soldiers wanted them to do. While all this was going on the US Forces and their Allies were trying to get back to the Philippines to free the nation from the Japanese oppression. This took over three years. When they did return they had to fight a sea battle, many land battles, rescue the POWs and drive the Japanese off the Philippine islands. Thousands died in this effort. Many hundreds of thousands of Filipinos died at the hands of the Japanese during the war and nearly a hundred thousand allied forces died to save the Philippines or as POWs. See the related links below.
What do you think of O'Brien's strategy for conducting a war with you having to put your own precious fluids on the line?
what do you think of o'brien strategy for conducting a war with "you having to put your own precious fluids on the line
What do you think of O’Brien’s strategy for conducting a war with “you having to put your own precious fluids on the line”?
I think O'Brien's strategy for conducting a war with "you having to put your own precious fluids on the line" is a risky one but one that could be effective if executed properly. It is a strategy based on the idea that if a soldier is willing to put their own blood, sweat, and tears into a battle, it will help to motivate them to fight harder and with more determination. The idea is that by having soldiers make a personal investment in the fight, they will be more likely to give their all and give it their all in a fight. At the same time, this strategy can be incredibly dangerous. It puts a soldier's well-being at risk, which can be a huge detriment to morale and effectiveness. Additionally, it can be difficult to measure just how much of an effect this strategy has on the battlefield. It can be difficult to measure just how much of an effect this strategy has on a soldier's motivation, and it can be even more difficult to measure its overall effect on the battlefield. Ultimately, I believe that O'Brien's strategy of having soldiers put their own fluids on the line is a risky one, but one that could be effective if done properly. It requires a delicate balance between motivating and protecting soldiers, as well as being able to measure its effectiveness in battle. If this balance can be achieved, it could be a powerful tool for any military.
Why are the tires for trucks carrying gasoline and other flammable fluids manufactured to be electrically conducting?
to keep truck grounded on uninsulated roads
What are life threatening consequences of sever burn?
The body loses it's precious supply of fluids containing proteins and electrolytes, or dehydration and electrolytes imbalance follow can lead to a shutdown of kidneys and circulatory shocks.
What is the medical term meaning fluids intravenously?
The medical term for fluids administered intravenously is "intravenous fluids" or "IV fluids." These fluids are given directly into a vein to help maintain hydration, replace lost fluids, deliver medications, or provide nutrition.
What are second grade fluids?
Second grade fluids are fluids that flow through a parallel plate. The fluids go through the parallel plate horizontal.
What industries use fluids?
depends what fluids, but all industries use some sort of fluids in most proccesses
Is a soda can a good conductor of electricity?
Coke is the solid carbonaceous material derived from destructive distillation of low-ash, low-sulfur bituminous coal. Cokes from coal are grey, hard, porous, and not considered good at conducting electricity.
What fluids are studied in chemistry tests?
All the types of fluids !
Why are there different viscosity's of hydraulic fluids?
sity hydraulic fluids
What are food fluids?
Food fluids are the juices from the food as it is cooking.
When was Physics of Fluids created?
Physics of Fluids was created in 1958.
