It sounds like someone who is concerned with an offender recieving a light sentence. Typically, a conviction for first-degree murder is going to carry a much heavier sentence and include much more jail time than a conviction for a lesser offense, so whoever said it probably wants the maximum possible punishment for the offender.
This is a good example of circumstantial evidence; this is basically when the evidence is just a matter of "in the wrong place at the wrong time". If there was little other evidence besides it a prosecution would find it very difficult to get a trial, much less a conviction.
the senate vote was one less than the number needed fro conviction
I would expect that it would. As with so many things now while it may not disqualify you directly, why hire someone with a conviction when there are so many applicants without a conviction. Add to that the fact that this could be seen as a morals issue and your chances become less and less.
Clued-Less - 2012 Murder She Didn't Write 1-2 was released on: USA: 2012
A sentence using anything less:You can take anything less than five.
Ask my sister!
The law states you must serve no less than 45 days in prison
If it has been less than five years since the date of your conviction or adjudication, you cannot get your criminal record expunged now. You must wait until five years have passed from the date of your conviction or from the date of your juvenile adjudication. You may be able to get an expungement once the five years are up. See link below:
by taking them to the hospital to see what the doctors can do
4,00
A house where a murder was committed would lower the value of the house and be less likely to sell.
The standard for juries to convict in criminal trials is: "Beyond A REASONABLE Doubt." NOT ALL doubt, only 'reasonable' doubt. The standard for juries to convict in civil trials is: "The WEIGHT of the evidence." Therefore, the standard for conviction in a civil trial is LESS than what is required in a criminal trial.